I agree it's spookily good. My main issue is the lack of transparency, accountability, consistency, reliability of AI ... & the idea that humans can just 'do a quick check/edit' doesn't work without the hard graft of detailed corpus research behind that checking ... which takes time/expertise.

Well, yes, BUT ... and the 'but' is too long to go into here but it may end up as a blog post ... watch this space ...

I think this may be a British thing ... we tend to use 'girlfriend' to (almost exclusively) describe a romantic partner, not just a friend who happens to be female (and WAG is a BrE term)

I just went to find the link to join this and realized I registered but was never sent a link 😕 Hope it goes/went well anyway.

I'd like to tune in online, but the link takes me to what looks like a ticket for the in-person event. Do I guess that if I sign up, I'll get sent the online link anyway?

Not new, but "transactional" could be having a bit of a moment ... (trend from English Trends corpus, 2014-now)

Okay, I'll try & tune in with tea #3 ...