I understand possessive investment in material prosperity! I get it. But not to the exclusion of the safety of vulnerable people. That voice that says "why are they destroying..." STOP. Think about the violence and oppression that CAUSED that response. Don't get it twisted.

But what did the Weathermen do in the late 60s early 70s? Damage EMPTY property to call attention to injustice.* What did the suffragettes do to call attention to their plight? Damage property to call attention to the injustice they were suffering.*

*Obviously they did other things as well...

I'll be blunt: the Nazis knew better than to burn the Louvre. They knew destroying prized property would get more people into the streets of Paris than kidnapping entire neighborhoods of Jewish people. And they were right. White folk fetishize property & not vulnerable people. Stop doing that!

Thank you! I really needed that today. 💙💙 I forgive you for not coming to DC for this book. 😢

More details: Chief Justice Roberts, acting on his own, issued an “administrative stay,” an interim measure intended to preserve the status quo while the justices deliberate on the matter.

I mean, it only takes a minute for the by-now superintelligent AI to tell them how to proceed, right?

That's efficiency. 🙄

Additionally, a memo released ahead of a cabinet meeting called for a “significant reduction” in the federal workforce but did not specify numbers. Federal agencies have been directed to submit downsizing plans by March 13—just one day before the current government funding deadline.

But even if every federal worker were fired, it wouldn’t make a dent in the massive deficit increase Trump is proposing. The total federal employee payroll amounts to $271 billion—nowhere near enough to offset the trillions being added to the debt. So what’s the purpose here?

Trump pardons violent people who attacked officers, but peaceful protest—that’s where we draw the line.