Curious as to how you know her motives w such certainty

For context this was for insulting editor of Mother Jones b/c she implied that the NYT’s actions were getting disproportionate criticism compared to other things seen in emails

Willful misreading and mischaracterization

Disney exploded decades ago when new technology enabled them to make a fortune off of creative property (VHS, DVD, Streaming). They poured plenty of that money into new content but their success was never about CEO brilliance. Right place, right time

ngl It would be pretty funny if Bill Clinton turned out to be a total boy scout in this and that KEN STARR was the guilty one.

Seriously? This is the person you want to express anger toward? There are a lot of better people to focus on. Wait, are you an actual paid agitator? I’ve heard of them

Dude, really? Did you look at her bio? Have you read her work? Also, I’m curious about whether you would be as dismissive of a man writing this comment?

So you are saying we need to (gulp) have long and sometimes painful conversations with the people in our lives?

Thanks so much

Absolutely all must have consequences. I’m just saying I will have considerably more mercy for one category after they have served their time

Would you consider sharing this as a gift article?

Would love to celebrate but I’m not sure we are there yet

Absolutely. And also — much as I hate to say it — we do need to be able to discuss situations w nuance

Let’s hope this time is the exception

Exactly. And we need a rigorous investigation about which of these people were rich. The ones that were only stupid may remain in polite society. The others should be shunned in all personal and professional settings