Ko-Fan Chen 陳克帆
banner
kofanchen.biologists.social.ap.brid.gy
Ko-Fan Chen 陳克帆
@kofanchen.biologists.social.ap.brid.gy
Working with #Drosophila to understand #sleep and #circadian rhythm. Lecturer in #Neurogenetics at University of #Leicester

🌉 bridged from ⁂ https://biologists.social/@kofanchen, follow @ap.brid.gy to interact
*Also we do have a PhD position open to continue this investigation with the aid of #connectome in collaboration with Nils Reinhard @nils-reinhard.bsky.social
See details at https://www.kofanchenlab.net/come-join-us
Come Join US
Fully funded PhD position available:
www.kofanchenlab.net
November 4, 2025 at 11:32 PM
also to add, the power of #openscience and PhD thesis deposition also lead us to realise others also find the same!
https://theses.hal.science/tel-04916427v1
Regulation of Sleep-wake rhythms by light in Drosophila melanogaster : Cellular and molecular histaminergic pathways from the visual System to clock neurons
Circadian docks orchestrate daily rhythms of physiological and behavioral processes in almost ail living organisms. This régulation relies on a molecular mechanism featuring transcriptional feedback loops, resulting in oscillations of clock gene expression. In Drosophi/a melanogaster, about 150 clock neurons form a self-sustaining mechanism, synchronizing through inter-neuronal communication to create a unified neuronal network and robust behavioral rhythms. A key aspect is the clock's ability to synchronize with day-night cycles by using external eues, or zeitgebers, with light being the most influential. Under 12/12 light-dark cycle, flies are crepuscular with morning and evening activity peaks during dawn and dusk, separated by daytime sleep aka siesta and nighttime sleep. Drosophila circadian photoreception involves two pathways: one utilizing the blue-light-sensitive photoreceptor Cryptochrome (Cry) expressed in approximately half of clock neurons, and the other involving the visual System expressing Rhodopsins.This thesis explores the régulation of the sleep-wake cycle and clock resetting through light input pathways, specifically focusing on the visual System. It includes three parts. The first part aimed at unravelling how Rhodopsin-dependent light pathways reset the circadian oscillator at the molecular level in the different clock neurons. Although it is known that light-activated Cry binds to the Timeless (Tim) clock protein, leading to circadian molecular clock resetting, the mechanism employed by visual System pathways remains elusive. Using cry mutants and a prolonged light puise protocol, the study analysed the initial molecular changes in clock neurons after light exposure. Results demonstrated that the visual System pathway also targets Tim, with its levels decreasing in response to light. The second part focused on the rôle of individual Rhodopsin-expressing photoreceptors in circadian entrainment under different light intensifies. Multi-mutant flies expressing only one of the six rhodopsins were used to discern their contributions. In low light conditions, where the NorpA-dependent phototransduction pathway is active, Rh1 and Rh6 emerged as the primary contributors to entrainment. Contrastingly, in high light conditions involving both canonical and non-canonical phototransduction pathways, ail six rhodopsin- expressing photoreceptors were found to provide entrainment, with Rh1, Rh5, and Rh6 being the most efficient in this process. The third part of this study focuses on the régulation of sleep via light in Drosophila, where sleep is characterized by sustained periods of quiescence, or 5-minute inactivity intervals associated with an increased arousal threshold. This régulation is orchestrated by the interplay of two processes: the homeostatic System and the circadian System. The research delves into the rôle of light, particularly through the light receptors Cry and the visual System, under high light intensity conditions. Additionally, the study explores the involvement of different phototransduction pathways and histaminergic downstream pathways in this sleep régulation process. The findings suggest that both Cry and the visual System are sufficient and required for the proper functioning of sleep. In contrast to entrainment, the canonical phototransduction pathway and the two histamine receptors are required to regulate the siesta effectively.
theses.hal.science
November 4, 2025 at 11:55 AM
November 4, 2025 at 11:16 AM
This work is a team effort from undergraduates, Erasmus, MSc, PhD and postdocs from the lab, thank you Yu-Chien, Mehran @mehranakhtar Xinghua @lixinghua Steven, Nithish, Clelia, Tobias and Jashmine for making this investigation possible!

#neuroscience
November 4, 2025 at 11:14 AM
So, what did we find?
1) Strikingly, seven of the eight tested mutants with mutations in four different phototransduction genes showed less sleep or shorter sleep bouts in the day.
2) artificially hyperpolarising eye photoreceptor also cause similar sleep […]

[Original post on biologists.social]
November 4, 2025 at 11:14 AM
Since we used a locomotion-based method to define sleep in Drosophila we also employed a long-forgotten analysis of waking activity: a simple ratio of locomotor activity over wake period, so we can be confident any increased amounts of sleep in mutants are not a result of loss of locomotion (eg […]
Original post on biologists.social
biologists.social
November 4, 2025 at 11:10 AM
To make sure the mutants we acquired retain their defects in phototransduction, the first author Yu-Chien Hung teamed up with Ben Warren at Keele University to record electroretinogram.
4/8
November 4, 2025 at 11:10 AM
This is perhaps not surprising as vision are known to maintain one’s wakefulness and the same time providing sleep drive.

We therefore decided to look at the sleep profiles for all the classic mutant lines that affects phototransduction, plus those with […]

[Original post on biologists.social]
November 4, 2025 at 11:09 AM
For a naive 1st year Biology student, one would think such questions must have been answered long before, considering vision and light sensing are one of the most studied in Drosophila? But it was not the cast around 2020s. Instead, opposing evidence showing in vision can either suppress or […]
Original post on biologists.social
biologists.social
November 4, 2025 at 11:07 AM
Reposted by Ko-Fan Chen 陳克帆
That said: qed is a tool.

The user should not cede critical thinking to qed. It's worrying that qed reviews could inject hallucinations at scale...

What's more, qed hallucinated misinformation off a supp figure. A lazy reviewer ignoring the supp would've been better... A cautionary tale.

11/n
November 1, 2025 at 12:15 PM