A dancing rainbow!

P.S. if I split out 'progressive/left' and call D66 and Volt 'progressive centre' then we find this picture

Minor update in morning estimate

I'm assuming Ipsos just shares the data directly with NOS, not anything else. The NOS website reads "© NOS. Bron: IPSOS, in opdracht van NOS en RTL"

Ah fair question - no I just based it on the news reporting.
Do you have a link?

No changes in the 21:30 exitpoll update.

In addition to @openclimatedata.net on AR5; section 2.1.2 tried to summarise this for all ARs: gmd.copernicus.org/articles/15/...

After writing it, I also wanted to do this. So if you embark on it I'm keen to help. I did already collect even older emissions data (RCP, AR4, SRES, even IS92!)

So, feel free to connect/reach out with anything you feel may be helpful research and suggestions!

Attached a screenshot with the topics we will cover in our chapter.

All chapter outlines: www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/...

In light of the International Court of Justice’s reaffirmation of the importance of IPCC reports, I believe its very important to do our best to improve on past reports, as a scientific community, providing solid scientific evidence for what's very urgent: good, well-informed, climate action.

- also here showing 'human-induced' forcing (only anthropogenic), whereas the paper generally presents data including also natural forcing (regular solar cycles). These solar cycle peaks can affect the total forcing or temp peaks a small bit too

A few subtle differences:
- Fig 3 is temperature, not Effective Radiative Forcing
- the plot Ken is showing picks a few 'illustrative pathways', to highlight higher (two left) and very low (two right) climate outcomes. The paper always looks at larger _groups_ of scenarios

Thanks Ken :).
I thought this was a time to keep the y-axis constant across panels to highlight exactly that and accept that half of the facets are just whitespace -- show those contributors to warming don't matter nearly as much as CO2.

Yes, these scenarios also include (lots of) decarbonization

That's definitely crucial. The scenarios themselves (created with integrated assessment models) in this paper suggest start from the current infrastructures and project pathways of structural change away from that.