Kevin Troy
LightNews LightNews
banner
kevintroy.bsky.social
Kevin Troy
@kevintroy.bsky.social
68 followers 99 following 220 posts
Could I be the liberal Joe Rogan? No, I could not. Virginia native, long time New Yorker. I’d rather be reading Tolstoy.
Posts Replies Media Videos
kevintroy.bsky.social
The good news is that, after 60 years, almost 40% of the plutonium has decayed to U-234, which is barely radioactive at all
December 14, 2025 at 2:08 AM
kevintroy.bsky.social
Ea-Nasir jokes never get old, at least not compared to this crummy copper he sent me
December 11, 2025 at 9:49 PM
kevintroy.bsky.social
Why couldn’t the president articulate that when he announced it?
December 11, 2025 at 1:34 AM
kevintroy.bsky.social
Crossover possibilities with many novels by established brands Ernest Hemingway and Alan Furst!
December 6, 2025 at 8:28 PM
kevintroy.bsky.social
“If you receive less than $5 as an incentive to complete this survey, you are being ripped off.”
December 3, 2025 at 4:22 PM
kevintroy.bsky.social
He’s a Parseltongue!
December 2, 2025 at 10:28 PM
kevintroy.bsky.social
Ooof, sorry to hear that
December 2, 2025 at 10:24 PM
kevintroy.bsky.social
I’ve seen “traditional AI” used to encompass not just ML, but also expert systems, heuristic-based programs, and other LISP/Prolog type stuff. Or put another way, everything but GenAI
December 2, 2025 at 5:20 AM
Reposted by Kevin Troy
kissphoria.bsky.social
idk not to mention how very nuanced and normal the actual response here was
Trans Professors comment Mel Curth (She/They) November 16, 2025 at 2:04 PM Please note that I am not deducting points because you have certain beliefs, but instead I am deducting point for you posting a reaction paper that does not answer the questions for this assignment, contradicts itself, heavily uses personal ideology over empirical evidence in a scientific class, and is at times offensive. While you are entitled to your own personal beliefs, there is an appropriate time or place to implement them in your reflections. I encourage all students to question or challenge the course material with other empirical findings or testable hypotheses, but using your own personal beliefs to argue against the findings of not only this article, but the findings of countless articles across psychology, biology, sociology, etc. is not best practice. You argue that abiding by normative gender roles is beneficial (it is perfectly fine to believe this. but to then say that evervone should act TPUSA OU Trans Professors comment the same, while also saying that people aren't pressured into gendered expectations is contradictory, especially since your arguments reflect a religious pressure to act in gender-stereotypical ways. You can say that strict gender norms don't create gender stereotypes, but that isn't true by definition of what a stereotype is. Please note that acknowledging gender stereotypes does not immediately denote a negative connotation, a nuance this article discusses. Additionally, to call an entire group of people "demonic" is highly offensive, especially a minoritized population. You are entitled to your own beliefs, but this isn't a vague narrative of "society pushes lies," but instead the result of countless years developing psychological and scientific evidence for these claims and directly interacting with the communities involved. You may personally disagree with this, but that TPUSA OU 2 Trans Professors comment doesn't change the fact that every major psychological, medical, pediatric, and psychiatric association in the United States acknowledges that, biologically and psychologically, sex and gender is neither binary nor fixed. I implore you apply some more perspective and empathy in your work. If you personally disagree with the findings, then by all means share your criticisms, but make sure to do so in a way that is appropriate and using the methodology of empirical psychology, as aligned with the learning goals in this class. If you have any additional questions or concerns about this or would like some additional educational resources, I would be happy to discuss this further and provide you with them. 3 TPUSA OU Additional professor Megan Waldron (She/Her/Hers) November 16, 2025 at 3:09 PM Samantha, I am the other instructor for this course, and I have also taken the time to read your paper. I concur with Mel on the grade you received. This paper should not be considered as a completion of the assignment. Everyone has different ways in which they see the world, but in an academic course such as this you are being asked to support your ideas with empirical evidence and higher-level reasoning. I find it concerning that you state at the beginning of your paper that you do not think bullying ("teasing") is a bad thing. In addition, your paper directly and harshly criticizes your peers and their opinions, which are just as valuable as yours. Disagreeing with others is fine, but there is a respectful way to go about it. That goes for discussion posts as well as reaction papers. Please employ more thoughtfulness in your future assignments TPUSA OU
November 29, 2025 at 3:45 PM