Kevin Morris
@kevintmorris.bsky.social
Senior Research Fellow and Voting Policy Scholar at @BrennanCenter.org. Democracy is good, prisons are bad. Usually on a bike, beach, or backpacking trip.
kevintmorris.com
Posts regularly deleted using https://bsky.jazco.dev/cleanup.
kevintmorris.com
Posts regularly deleted using https://bsky.jazco.dev/cleanup.
One other thing worth noting: Many of the so-called false electors are being charged with violations of state law. The president cannot issue pardons for these crimes, but only for violations of federal law.
November 11, 2025 at 12:04 AM
One other thing worth noting: Many of the so-called false electors are being charged with violations of state law. The president cannot issue pardons for these crimes, but only for violations of federal law.
2. Trump pardoned dozens of individuals today who tried to overturn the 2020 election. A healthy democracy calls attempts to overturn the democratic process what they are: Treason. This should raise concerns even higher about this administration's commitment to democratic processes in 2028 / 2029.
Trump pardons Giuliani and other allies who worked to overturn his 2020 election loss
The federal pardon, which is largely symbolic, covers the so-called fake electors, some of whom still face state charges.
www.votebeat.org
November 10, 2025 at 11:49 PM
2. Trump pardoned dozens of individuals today who tried to overturn the 2020 election. A healthy democracy calls attempts to overturn the democratic process what they are: Treason. This should raise concerns even higher about this administration's commitment to democratic processes in 2028 / 2029.
(I'm especially interested in hearing your experiences with PUP!)
November 10, 2025 at 7:53 PM
(I'm especially interested in hearing your experiences with PUP!)
Yeah but this also has the possibility of taking a 5th circuit decision and making it apply nationwide
November 10, 2025 at 5:27 PM
Yeah but this also has the possibility of taking a 5th circuit decision and making it apply nationwide
Reposted by Kevin Morris
The Supreme Court did grant review of one case today, Watson v. Republican National Committee, and it's a big one over state laws allowing the counting of ballots cast by Election Day but received after Election Day.
Here's the docket: www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docke...
And question presented:
Here's the docket: www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docke...
And question presented:
November 10, 2025 at 2:46 PM
The Supreme Court did grant review of one case today, Watson v. Republican National Committee, and it's a big one over state laws allowing the counting of ballots cast by Election Day but received after Election Day.
Here's the docket: www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docke...
And question presented:
Here's the docket: www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docke...
And question presented:
That said, if the leftward shifts were due in large part to new voters flooding in, we'd probably expect to see bigger shifts left where aggregate turnout was higher
November 7, 2025 at 7:24 PM
That said, if the leftward shifts were due in large part to new voters flooding in, we'd probably expect to see bigger shifts left where aggregate turnout was higher
You are right that it's tough at this point. When we get voter file records in a few weeks, we'll be able to figure out where there was a lot of churn (ie, different voters voting) versus stability in the electorate, and see where that maps onto aggregate vote shifts
November 7, 2025 at 7:24 PM
You are right that it's tough at this point. When we get voter file records in a few weeks, we'll be able to figure out where there was a lot of churn (ie, different voters voting) versus stability in the electorate, and see where that maps onto aggregate vote shifts
Not yet, but I'll be incorporating it when I do!
November 7, 2025 at 4:53 PM
Not yet, but I'll be incorporating it when I do!
Miranda they offered them CAKE, what more should they have done???
November 7, 2025 at 2:36 PM
Miranda they offered them CAKE, what more should they have done???
I mean, I guess it does: If you intentionally misgender someone, you are expressing that you are a huge dick. Learning that about someone is often a matter of pressing public concern!
November 7, 2025 at 2:24 PM
I mean, I guess it does: If you intentionally misgender someone, you are expressing that you are a huge dick. Learning that about someone is often a matter of pressing public concern!
I was thinking the same thing when I biked by this spot in Canarsie the other day 😂
November 7, 2025 at 2:10 PM
I was thinking the same thing when I biked by this spot in Canarsie the other day 😂
I can't imagine putting out a number like this without having lost a very big bet lmao
November 7, 2025 at 1:36 AM
I can't imagine putting out a number like this without having lost a very big bet lmao