Kaspar Rosager Ludvigsen
@kasparrosager.bsky.social
Assistant Professor in Medical Law, Durham University. DK lawyer (EU Law/CPS/AI/MD/Safety). Formerly postdoc, Edinburgh University/Newcastle University. PhD (CS), Cybersecurity/Law, University of Strathclyde. Gourmand. ORCID: 0000-0001-7243-2548
Udover fantastiske artikler i det hele taget, så er jeg stærkt glad for at få adgang til Sørens indtalinger af hans artikler. Han er stadigvæk en absurd god oplæser (og skriver), og så kan emner som haven, landet, mennesker, og eftertænksomhed virkelig noget for mig. Det er meget dejligt.
November 10, 2025 at 1:24 PM
Udover fantastiske artikler i det hele taget, så er jeg stærkt glad for at få adgang til Sørens indtalinger af hans artikler. Han er stadigvæk en absurd god oplæser (og skriver), og så kan emner som haven, landet, mennesker, og eftertænksomhed virkelig noget for mig. Det er meget dejligt.
Hvis man kun vil lave karaktersystemer fordi vi vil eksportere studerende, så kunne man jo sige det fra starten af, og bare kopiere flere slags skalaer i stedet for at beholde den danske. Virker tåbeligt. 6 tallet kommer til at blive virkelig, virkelig træls at få.
November 6, 2025 at 1:38 PM
Hvis man kun vil lave karaktersystemer fordi vi vil eksportere studerende, så kunne man jo sige det fra starten af, og bare kopiere flere slags skalaer i stedet for at beholde den danske. Virker tåbeligt. 6 tallet kommer til at blive virkelig, virkelig træls at få.
Det er lidt det samme problem som herovre - hvad er pointen med en karakter absolut ingen (næsten) kan opnå (vi har 1 - 100%, ingen får over 85 her)? Internationalt ville en karakter mange ville kunne opnå være mere fair, du får stadigvæk problemer med opregning med det nye system uanset hvad.
November 6, 2025 at 1:37 PM
Det er lidt det samme problem som herovre - hvad er pointen med en karakter absolut ingen (næsten) kan opnå (vi har 1 - 100%, ingen får over 85 her)? Internationalt ville en karakter mange ville kunne opnå være mere fair, du får stadigvæk problemer med opregning med det nye system uanset hvad.
Jeg synes at man godt kunne være mere patriotiske - vi kunne beholde det som de sidst tilfældigvis bestemte (det jeg fik i hele mit uddannelsesliv), for at forbedre det i stedet for at ændre det til noget underligt hybrid noget. Ligner ikke hvad vi gør herovre overhovedet, heller ikke noget i EU.
November 6, 2025 at 10:24 AM
Jeg synes at man godt kunne være mere patriotiske - vi kunne beholde det som de sidst tilfældigvis bestemte (det jeg fik i hele mit uddannelsesliv), for at forbedre det i stedet for at ændre det til noget underligt hybrid noget. Ligner ikke hvad vi gør herovre overhovedet, heller ikke noget i EU.
Er det for at få cum laude at de gør det her pjat?
November 6, 2025 at 10:20 AM
Er det for at få cum laude at de gør det her pjat?
Plates (all the time) and bending over consistently are you big friends. Definitely 28 for me.
November 3, 2025 at 1:51 PM
Plates (all the time) and bending over consistently are you big friends. Definitely 28 for me.
Reposted by Kaspar Rosager Ludvigsen
Whatever strategy you’re about to suggest, we’ve thought about it. docs.google.com/document/d/1...
ChatGPT Harm Reduction for Writing Assignments
ChatGPT Harm Reduction for Writing Assignments Because this document has escaped containment, a couple points of explanation. I wrote this for myself and a few colleagues as we work out how to handle...
docs.google.com
October 28, 2025 at 1:02 PM
Whatever strategy you’re about to suggest, we’ve thought about it. docs.google.com/document/d/1...
Reposted by Kaspar Rosager Ludvigsen
i made a template you can use to think about what "frame/negation/kirby" looks like for other issues.
For example:
Frame: DOGE is a govt efficiency project to save $
Negation: Actually it made things less efficient and cost $
Kirby: DOGE was a project to break and privatize federal bureaucracy
For example:
Frame: DOGE is a govt efficiency project to save $
Negation: Actually it made things less efficient and cost $
Kirby: DOGE was a project to break and privatize federal bureaucracy
September 25, 2025 at 8:23 PM
i made a template you can use to think about what "frame/negation/kirby" looks like for other issues.
For example:
Frame: DOGE is a govt efficiency project to save $
Negation: Actually it made things less efficient and cost $
Kirby: DOGE was a project to break and privatize federal bureaucracy
For example:
Frame: DOGE is a govt efficiency project to save $
Negation: Actually it made things less efficient and cost $
Kirby: DOGE was a project to break and privatize federal bureaucracy
😞I tend to stay away from edited volumes, might be why. Will keep an eye out for it and report back, just for fun.
October 24, 2025 at 2:53 PM
😞I tend to stay away from edited volumes, might be why. Will keep an eye out for it and report back, just for fun.
Reposted by Kaspar Rosager Ludvigsen
The academic's headstone
October 23, 2025 at 8:13 PM
The academic's headstone
The only exception to this, is where it is repeated earlier in the text, and you return to it later. In that case, I can usually understand it contextually, but I am surprised that peer reviewers let this slip by?!
October 24, 2025 at 2:46 PM
The only exception to this, is where it is repeated earlier in the text, and you return to it later. In that case, I can usually understand it contextually, but I am surprised that peer reviewers let this slip by?!
I feel blessed because I do not see this much regardless of gender in my recent readings, but this is supposed to be a bachelor student level thing (shameful above it in my view). You don't go "critics say" etc. without backing it up, and I will lower their final grade if I see it too much.
October 24, 2025 at 2:46 PM
I feel blessed because I do not see this much regardless of gender in my recent readings, but this is supposed to be a bachelor student level thing (shameful above it in my view). You don't go "critics say" etc. without backing it up, and I will lower their final grade if I see it too much.