@christophniemann.bsky.social
@christophniemann.bsky.social
not reproducible ≠ wrong/false/fluke
reproducible ≠ true
not reproducible ≠ poor science
reproducible ≠ good science
reproducibility of results is not a reliable indicator of truth/research quality/epistemic progress.
replication of a poorly designed study is another poorly designed study.
🌲
not reproducible ≠ wrong/false/fluke
reproducible ≠ true
not reproducible ≠ poor science
reproducible ≠ good science
reproducibility of results is not a reliable indicator of truth/research quality/epistemic progress.
replication of a poorly designed study is another poorly designed study.
🌲
But catch them later in their career, especially the ones who've developed an interest in research, & it can be very rewarding.
We need to rethink when & how we offer research training to medics.
But catch them later in their career, especially the ones who've developed an interest in research, & it can be very rewarding.
We need to rethink when & how we offer research training to medics.
statsepi.substack.com/p/im-not-a-r...
statsepi.substack.com/p/im-not-a-r...