Joe Rugola
@joerugola.bsky.social
IT oddball, West coast night owl, reader. He/him
Per our bestie, wife’s and my ancient dog is “The Dowager Doggess of the Pacific Northwest”
November 17, 2025 at 11:59 PM
Per our bestie, wife’s and my ancient dog is “The Dowager Doggess of the Pacific Northwest”
Columbia in the cap of liberty goes extremely hard.
November 14, 2025 at 1:30 AM
Columbia in the cap of liberty goes extremely hard.
I remember that bit, it’s right next to the part about how prisons should be torment boxes and xenophobia is great.
November 10, 2025 at 8:51 AM
I remember that bit, it’s right next to the part about how prisons should be torment boxes and xenophobia is great.
“Mick Fleetwood, the fish-man from Star Trek TNG.”
November 3, 2025 at 8:15 AM
“Mick Fleetwood, the fish-man from Star Trek TNG.”
evergreen (*begins applying joker makeup*)
September 24, 2025 at 6:51 PM
evergreen (*begins applying joker makeup*)
Immediately below the highlighted section is a sentence that ends “without vilifying and demonizing children”.
Dems should *not* even consider throwing trans people under the bus. And “concerns” is bs, I agree. But I did read the article, and her position doesn’t justify the response.
Dems should *not* even consider throwing trans people under the bus. And “concerns” is bs, I agree. But I did read the article, and her position doesn’t justify the response.
September 20, 2025 at 5:14 PM
Immediately below the highlighted section is a sentence that ends “without vilifying and demonizing children”.
Dems should *not* even consider throwing trans people under the bus. And “concerns” is bs, I agree. But I did read the article, and her position doesn’t justify the response.
Dems should *not* even consider throwing trans people under the bus. And “concerns” is bs, I agree. But I did read the article, and her position doesn’t justify the response.
I admit that part of me yearns to take to the steppes under the banner of the Great Khan.
August 22, 2025 at 9:24 AM
I admit that part of me yearns to take to the steppes under the banner of the Great Khan.
I think you can let the rank and file, NCOs, and non-flag officers who don’t own land or slaves off (albeit still harshly). But every flag officer hangs for sure (I can imagine *some* exceptions for those genuinely willing to be loyal), and landowners of any rank have it all confiscated.
August 8, 2025 at 10:53 AM
I think you can let the rank and file, NCOs, and non-flag officers who don’t own land or slaves off (albeit still harshly). But every flag officer hangs for sure (I can imagine *some* exceptions for those genuinely willing to be loyal), and landowners of any rank have it all confiscated.