thehill.com
January 10, 2026 at 1:30 AM
you have spent the last 24h saying that the woman in Minnesota was trying to run over ICE agents.
You are a troll, a bot or have the IQ of a cactus.
You are a troll, a bot or have the IQ of a cactus.
January 9, 2026 at 12:35 AM
you have spent the last 24h saying that the woman in Minnesota was trying to run over ICE agents.
You are a troll, a bot or have the IQ of a cactus.
You are a troll, a bot or have the IQ of a cactus.
Today is the next day and I see no article of impeachment proposed in congress, so yeah, no, they will complain and they even would dare to (gasp) write some strongly worded letter.
While the issue is hot, of course, next news cycle is all good and forgotten.
While the issue is hot, of course, next news cycle is all good and forgotten.
January 8, 2026 at 5:42 PM
Today is the next day and I see no article of impeachment proposed in congress, so yeah, no, they will complain and they even would dare to (gasp) write some strongly worded letter.
While the issue is hot, of course, next news cycle is all good and forgotten.
While the issue is hot, of course, next news cycle is all good and forgotten.
It will show who votes against.
Any reason it can't be brought again the next day?
Any reason it can't be brought again the next day?
January 8, 2026 at 7:49 AM
It will show who votes against.
Any reason it can't be brought again the next day?
Any reason it can't be brought again the next day?
Exactly. If tomorrow there are not at least an attempt of impeachment then they know it is free to do, no consequences!
January 8, 2026 at 3:01 AM
Exactly. If tomorrow there are not at least an attempt of impeachment then they know it is free to do, no consequences!
My understanding is that AOC could push for impeachment of the leader of that organization tomorrow. It is her prerogative to do.
When she said she hopes someone does something why is she not doing anything?
When she said she hopes someone does something why is she not doing anything?
January 8, 2026 at 3:00 AM
My understanding is that AOC could push for impeachment of the leader of that organization tomorrow. It is her prerogative to do.
When she said she hopes someone does something why is she not doing anything?
When she said she hopes someone does something why is she not doing anything?
At this point I really do not care about her saying it as it is.
"Any member of the House can introduce an impeachment resolution or call for an investigation."
I would rather listen to whoever is first tomorrow morning with the paperwork in.
Actions, enough talking.
"Any member of the House can introduce an impeachment resolution or call for an investigation."
I would rather listen to whoever is first tomorrow morning with the paperwork in.
Actions, enough talking.
January 8, 2026 at 2:12 AM
At this point I really do not care about her saying it as it is.
"Any member of the House can introduce an impeachment resolution or call for an investigation."
I would rather listen to whoever is first tomorrow morning with the paperwork in.
Actions, enough talking.
"Any member of the House can introduce an impeachment resolution or call for an investigation."
I would rather listen to whoever is first tomorrow morning with the paperwork in.
Actions, enough talking.
That may take time as per who holds the power to do that.
But cities and estates have control over their affairs, they must pass laws to protect their citizens from this.
Right away Minneapolis could put their police to tail ICE and arrest them right away if they do not follow the law
But cities and estates have control over their affairs, they must pass laws to protect their citizens from this.
Right away Minneapolis could put their police to tail ICE and arrest them right away if they do not follow the law
January 7, 2026 at 8:25 PM
That may take time as per who holds the power to do that.
But cities and estates have control over their affairs, they must pass laws to protect their citizens from this.
Right away Minneapolis could put their police to tail ICE and arrest them right away if they do not follow the law
But cities and estates have control over their affairs, they must pass laws to protect their citizens from this.
Right away Minneapolis could put their police to tail ICE and arrest them right away if they do not follow the law
That would not be more performative than effective.
You would need a general strike. It is similar to closing the government but closing everything else.
Imagine just WallStreet and every single bank closes. And they will not open till democracy is back.
The guy in the WH is kicked out in hours.
You would need a general strike. It is similar to closing the government but closing everything else.
Imagine just WallStreet and every single bank closes. And they will not open till democracy is back.
The guy in the WH is kicked out in hours.
January 7, 2026 at 6:48 PM
That would not be more performative than effective.
You would need a general strike. It is similar to closing the government but closing everything else.
Imagine just WallStreet and every single bank closes. And they will not open till democracy is back.
The guy in the WH is kicked out in hours.
You would need a general strike. It is similar to closing the government but closing everything else.
Imagine just WallStreet and every single bank closes. And they will not open till democracy is back.
The guy in the WH is kicked out in hours.
Yet no-one does anything.
I was there in the no-kings protest, it was fun, it was a party, it was on a Saturday, minimize the inconvenience, imagine you would disrupt anything, oh no, let's not do that.
I was there in the no-kings protest, it was fun, it was a party, it was on a Saturday, minimize the inconvenience, imagine you would disrupt anything, oh no, let's not do that.
January 7, 2026 at 8:08 AM
Yet no-one does anything.
I was there in the no-kings protest, it was fun, it was a party, it was on a Saturday, minimize the inconvenience, imagine you would disrupt anything, oh no, let's not do that.
I was there in the no-kings protest, it was fun, it was a party, it was on a Saturday, minimize the inconvenience, imagine you would disrupt anything, oh no, let's not do that.
That image, not even sure what you trying to do, a joke? Ok, sure.
Back to your original assertion, where is that coming from?
Back to your original assertion, where is that coming from?
December 28, 2025 at 4:20 AM
That image, not even sure what you trying to do, a joke? Ok, sure.
Back to your original assertion, where is that coming from?
Back to your original assertion, where is that coming from?
Agents have arrested about 130 Americans, including a dozen elected officials
This was back in October.
This was back in October.
December 27, 2025 at 3:03 PM
Agents have arrested about 130 Americans, including a dozen elected officials
This was back in October.
This was back in October.
Fake
It's not about government size but authoritarianism.
Strawman-ing arguments only make you look uninformed.
It's not about government size but authoritarianism.
Strawman-ing arguments only make you look uninformed.
December 27, 2025 at 3:02 PM
Fake
It's not about government size but authoritarianism.
Strawman-ing arguments only make you look uninformed.
It's not about government size but authoritarianism.
Strawman-ing arguments only make you look uninformed.
It is also irrelevant.
Dude wants to blast isis around the globe. I'm good with that.
It contradicts his own national strategy document though. Every day the US army has a different focus, it is very confusing
Dude wants to blast isis around the globe. I'm good with that.
It contradicts his own national strategy document though. Every day the US army has a different focus, it is very confusing
December 27, 2025 at 2:56 PM
It is also irrelevant.
Dude wants to blast isis around the globe. I'm good with that.
It contradicts his own national strategy document though. Every day the US army has a different focus, it is very confusing
Dude wants to blast isis around the globe. I'm good with that.
It contradicts his own national strategy document though. Every day the US army has a different focus, it is very confusing
You are telling me the guy desperate for evidence to not be released has nothing to hide?
How naive are you?
How naive are you?
December 27, 2025 at 2:51 PM
You are telling me the guy desperate for evidence to not be released has nothing to hide?
How naive are you?
How naive are you?
While their GDP in terms of $ is laughable, they are pretty self-reliant and the police state will ensure no protest grows too much. Even large GDP drops will not make it implode.
The good news is that they will also not have the resources to push forward, eventually they need to stop.
The good news is that they will also not have the resources to push forward, eventually they need to stop.
December 23, 2025 at 8:41 PM
While their GDP in terms of $ is laughable, they are pretty self-reliant and the police state will ensure no protest grows too much. Even large GDP drops will not make it implode.
The good news is that they will also not have the resources to push forward, eventually they need to stop.
The good news is that they will also not have the resources to push forward, eventually they need to stop.
Reposted by Jordi
How is this fast? It's been clear for weeks they would release redacted garbage.
This should have existed and public, then those releasing it would know and maybe not release garbage and if they do then this gets filed within the hour.
Now will take them weeks or whatever and this dies.
This should have existed and public, then those releasing it would know and maybe not release garbage and if they do then this gets filed within the hour.
Now will take them weeks or whatever and this dies.
December 21, 2025 at 4:31 AM
How is this fast? It's been clear for weeks they would release redacted garbage.
This should have existed and public, then those releasing it would know and maybe not release garbage and if they do then this gets filed within the hour.
Now will take them weeks or whatever and this dies.
This should have existed and public, then those releasing it would know and maybe not release garbage and if they do then this gets filed within the hour.
Now will take them weeks or whatever and this dies.
That's true, we can't compare states directly.
But this could happen:
- States that relax vaccination schedule show much worse outcomes.
- States that do not relax not much so.
- The timing of the decline closely relates to when each state changed protocol
But this could happen:
- States that relax vaccination schedule show much worse outcomes.
- States that do not relax not much so.
- The timing of the decline closely relates to when each state changed protocol
December 20, 2025 at 8:35 AM
That's true, we can't compare states directly.
But this could happen:
- States that relax vaccination schedule show much worse outcomes.
- States that do not relax not much so.
- The timing of the decline closely relates to when each state changed protocol
But this could happen:
- States that relax vaccination schedule show much worse outcomes.
- States that do not relax not much so.
- The timing of the decline closely relates to when each state changed protocol