James Pirruccello 🌉
@jamespirruccello.com
AI slop (except one) enjoyer
This IS a place of honor
November 5, 2025 at 2:26 AM
This IS a place of honor
Why is Grok fact-checking Bundt cake?
October 29, 2025 at 8:21 PM
Why is Grok fact-checking Bundt cake?
Sausalito and San Francisco
October 18, 2025 at 10:20 PM
Sausalito and San Francisco
I love artificial intelligence.
October 9, 2025 at 4:30 PM
I love artificial intelligence.
Do these 120 million patients understand that they’ve opted into whatever this is?
October 7, 2025 at 6:20 PM
Do these 120 million patients understand that they’ve opted into whatever this is?
Oh, were the rats sitting in the driver's seat of the car?
October 5, 2025 at 1:37 AM
Oh, were the rats sitting in the driver's seat of the car?
Was there really a 15 year gap between submission and publication, or is this just a technicality of "published *online*"???
October 5, 2025 at 12:59 AM
Was there really a 15 year gap between submission and publication, or is this just a technicality of "published *online*"???
Perfect weather for Hardly Strictly. Way more packed than last year. Great vibes.
October 5, 2025 at 12:01 AM
Perfect weather for Hardly Strictly. Way more packed than last year. Great vibes.
(see alt text; too long for a post)
October 4, 2025 at 5:39 AM
(see alt text; too long for a post)
If you like stars, you might enjoy the little Chrome extension that I had ChatGPT write for me:
October 4, 2025 at 3:24 AM
If you like stars, you might enjoy the little Chrome extension that I had ChatGPT write for me:
I love artificial intelligence.
September 26, 2025 at 2:07 AM
I love artificial intelligence.
Microsoft's AI knows that I really wanted to write "salaried position with with"
September 23, 2025 at 3:59 PM
Microsoft's AI knows that I really wanted to write "salaried position with with"
That was only a partial quote. So maybe this image is more fitting for the actual quotation:
"with very large numbers of n’s you don’t need randomization"
"with very large numbers of n’s you don’t need randomization"
September 21, 2025 at 9:38 PM
That was only a partial quote. So maybe this image is more fitting for the actual quotation:
"with very large numbers of n’s you don’t need randomization"
"with very large numbers of n’s you don’t need randomization"
With a large enough 'N', you don't need randomization.
- Keith Rabois
- Keith Rabois
September 21, 2025 at 9:32 PM
With a large enough 'N', you don't need randomization.
- Keith Rabois
- Keith Rabois
Doesn't look like there is a peer reviewed publication yet, just this PDF from Apple.
They say that they calculated an AUROC, but... they don't tell us what that AUROC was?
www.apple.com/health/pdf/H...
They say that they calculated an AUROC, but... they don't tell us what that AUROC was?
www.apple.com/health/pdf/H...
September 21, 2025 at 5:55 PM
Doesn't look like there is a peer reviewed publication yet, just this PDF from Apple.
They say that they calculated an AUROC, but... they don't tell us what that AUROC was?
www.apple.com/health/pdf/H...
They say that they calculated an AUROC, but... they don't tell us what that AUROC was?
www.apple.com/health/pdf/H...