@itsjustincase.bsky.social
It was a *test tank*, not a “super heavy” booster test. They conduct (novel idea), tests, with test tanks. Actually, not very novel at all. NASA blows up rockets during tests too.
January 22, 2026 at 1:57 AM
It was a *test tank*, not a “super heavy” booster test. They conduct (novel idea), tests, with test tanks. Actually, not very novel at all. NASA blows up rockets during tests too.
“Without their overs-seas bases the USA would be a regional power overnight”
Laughing hysterically.
Laughing hysterically.
January 20, 2026 at 1:56 AM
“Without their overs-seas bases the USA would be a regional power overnight”
Laughing hysterically.
Laughing hysterically.
Reposted
When SLS SRB exploded in test bench in June, it cost ~$300M.
When Starship fails in space it costs less than $200M.
SpaceX uses different development method. So far they have managed to deliver up to 90% cheaper than the next rocket developer.
My Starship IFT log attached:
When Starship fails in space it costs less than $200M.
SpaceX uses different development method. So far they have managed to deliver up to 90% cheaper than the next rocket developer.
My Starship IFT log attached:
January 19, 2026 at 7:48 PM
When SLS SRB exploded in test bench in June, it cost ~$300M.
When Starship fails in space it costs less than $200M.
SpaceX uses different development method. So far they have managed to deliver up to 90% cheaper than the next rocket developer.
My Starship IFT log attached:
When Starship fails in space it costs less than $200M.
SpaceX uses different development method. So far they have managed to deliver up to 90% cheaper than the next rocket developer.
My Starship IFT log attached:
If SpaceX was concerned about maintaining the constellation to save money on launch costs, they would not have lowered the altitude of the satellites.
Illustration that the shift to lower altitudes of the Starlink constellation has beein going on for over a year now:
January 5, 2026 at 1:26 AM
If SpaceX was concerned about maintaining the constellation to save money on launch costs, they would not have lowered the altitude of the satellites.
Brining peace by removing a murderous tyrant. It’s the kind of peace that only a brave President with competent generals can bring to the table.
January 4, 2026 at 6:36 AM
Brining peace by removing a murderous tyrant. It’s the kind of peace that only a brave President with competent generals can bring to the table.
Funny how the kill all fascists crowd are mad when a fascist gets removed from power
January 4, 2026 at 4:34 AM
Funny how the kill all fascists crowd are mad when a fascist gets removed from power
“To those who say that the United States is only interested in our oil, I ask those people: What do you think the Russians and the Chinese wanted… The recipe for Arepas?"
January 4, 2026 at 4:24 AM
“To those who say that the United States is only interested in our oil, I ask those people: What do you think the Russians and the Chinese wanted… The recipe for Arepas?"
There has never been an incident during a SpaceX flight that has resulted in an injury to people.
Yes… when they aren’t exploding over the Caribbean.
SpaceX has one big problem. A CEO who thinks safety is an impediment to innovation, and that government corruption is just the cost of doing business.
SpaceX has one big problem. A CEO who thinks safety is an impediment to innovation, and that government corruption is just the cost of doing business.
January 3, 2026 at 6:25 PM
There has never been an incident during a SpaceX flight that has resulted in an injury to people.
Lmao he blocked me for stating facts. These cry babies never stop crying
False, SpaceX is a contractor to the government. They provide service, for money.
January 3, 2026 at 6:03 PM
Lmao he blocked me for stating facts. These cry babies never stop crying
SpaceX has a larger valuation than the company that can’t fly astronauts to and from the ISS. Shocker? No.
Greater valuation than the big five defense contractors plus Boeing. Geez.
December 7, 2025 at 1:54 PM
SpaceX has a larger valuation than the company that can’t fly astronauts to and from the ISS. Shocker? No.
In one (1) post, I showed a mirror to a democrat.
Initially: wanting money to leave someone’s bank account to goto someone else.
Rebuttal: not wanting their own money to leave their bank account to be given to someone else.
Incredible.
Initially: wanting money to leave someone’s bank account to goto someone else.
Rebuttal: not wanting their own money to leave their bank account to be given to someone else.
Incredible.
October 14, 2025 at 3:16 AM
In one (1) post, I showed a mirror to a democrat.
Initially: wanting money to leave someone’s bank account to goto someone else.
Rebuttal: not wanting their own money to leave their bank account to be given to someone else.
Incredible.
Initially: wanting money to leave someone’s bank account to goto someone else.
Rebuttal: not wanting their own money to leave their bank account to be given to someone else.
Incredible.
Leftists have two rebuttals when presented with logic: ad hominem, or .223
This one chose ad hominem.
This one chose ad hominem.
MAGA Drones like you are always the dumbest kids in high school. Anonymous Coward
September 11, 2025 at 5:03 AM
Leftists have two rebuttals when presented with logic: ad hominem, or .223
This one chose ad hominem.
This one chose ad hominem.
“How can I make this about me, as trans person”?
September 10, 2025 at 8:11 PM
“How can I make this about me, as trans person”?