that many people consider weiss a serious commentator is one of those things that will always be unbelievable to me.

One way to think about it: Executive orders tell you very specifically what the executive branch thinks that the law is and how they will act like the law is.

Look I can put on my law professor hat and reconcile this with evolving case law and all that. But at some point you have to ask: is this a Court worth rehabilitating? They are failing to meet the moment. Just the opposite even: they are undermining the rule of law. (2/2)

Isn’t it that one maintains the status quo and current precedent and one overturns the status quo and suggests precedent will change before the case to do so is, in fact, ripe at SCOTUS?

Perhaps I misunderstand your point.

The fact this keeps happening reveals more about the profession than anything interesting about Generative AI because what do you mean you submitted fake cases to a court of law what???