Ioana A. Cristea
@ioanaacristea.bsky.social
Associate Professor @Unipd | Affiliate @METRICStanford | Scholar @FulbrightPrgrm | #Metaresearch #Openscience #Psychotherapy #Trials | @ERC_Research DECOMPOSE
https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101042701
https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101042701
Reposted by Ioana A. Cristea
Thanks to BMJ's Open peer-review fascinating to read that there was a considerable effort of peer-review invested into this trial before publication
November 3, 2025 at 4:30 AM
Thanks to BMJ's Open peer-review fascinating to read that there was a considerable effort of peer-review invested into this trial before publication
Of course I agree and know this, the point was that if we are chasing confounded associations, why only go for the ones that impact women?
September 23, 2025 at 9:27 AM
Of course I agree and know this, the point was that if we are chasing confounded associations, why only go for the ones that impact women?
Reposted by Ioana A. Cristea
Ioannidis: Do we enough evidence for your proposed actions to improve peer review?
Macleod: The evidence is thin, partly because many journals are hesitant to accommodate meta-research, like RCTs.
#PRC10
Macleod: The evidence is thin, partly because many journals are hesitant to accommodate meta-research, like RCTs.
#PRC10
September 4, 2025 at 1:29 PM
Ioannidis: Do we enough evidence for your proposed actions to improve peer review?
Macleod: The evidence is thin, partly because many journals are hesitant to accommodate meta-research, like RCTs.
#PRC10
Macleod: The evidence is thin, partly because many journals are hesitant to accommodate meta-research, like RCTs.
#PRC10
Reposted by Ioana A. Cristea
As a reminder, our comment published here (sciencedirect.com/science/arti...) showed that (i) randomization never occurred; (ii) irregularities in baseline scores, which for the same students vary systematically in ways that are unique to either the treatment or control group; ...
August 27, 2025 at 3:33 PM
As a reminder, our comment published here (sciencedirect.com/science/arti...) showed that (i) randomization never occurred; (ii) irregularities in baseline scores, which for the same students vary systematically in ways that are unique to either the treatment or control group; ...
August 24, 2025 at 9:04 AM
It’s not BMJ Open but BMJ Open Research. I see some Frontiers and MDPI, you mean in these cases they actually *do* some review?
August 24, 2025 at 9:03 AM
It’s not BMJ Open but BMJ Open Research. I see some Frontiers and MDPI, you mean in these cases they actually *do* some review?