Reposted by Bram
The only fair way to handle this is to appoint a team of teenagers to tear this company limb from limb until we find out what kind of financial damage they are hiding and where
March 20, 2025 at 1:14 AM
The only fair way to handle this is to appoint a team of teenagers to tear this company limb from limb until we find out what kind of financial damage they are hiding and where
Reposted by Bram
Also if you feel strongly about Eric Adams, you should call your city councilmember to express that and ask for their position.
You’d be surprised. Hochul’s stance is highly disappointing but it doesn’t come from nowhere. Press all your electeds. City elections are in 5 months. Ask candidates too.
You’d be surprised. Hochul’s stance is highly disappointing but it doesn’t come from nowhere. Press all your electeds. City elections are in 5 months. Ask candidates too.
February 22, 2025 at 8:21 PM
Also if you feel strongly about Eric Adams, you should call your city councilmember to express that and ask for their position.
You’d be surprised. Hochul’s stance is highly disappointing but it doesn’t come from nowhere. Press all your electeds. City elections are in 5 months. Ask candidates too.
You’d be surprised. Hochul’s stance is highly disappointing but it doesn’t come from nowhere. Press all your electeds. City elections are in 5 months. Ask candidates too.
Reposted by Bram
Adams must be removed. The city cannot sustain being governed for nearly a year by a Mayor who is being coerced by Trump admin in order to escape charges.
This corruption poses a real threat to the people of the city. He should have resigned a while ago, but will not. So it’s time for him to go.
This corruption poses a real threat to the people of the city. He should have resigned a while ago, but will not. So it’s time for him to go.
February 13, 2025 at 11:40 PM
Adams must be removed. The city cannot sustain being governed for nearly a year by a Mayor who is being coerced by Trump admin in order to escape charges.
This corruption poses a real threat to the people of the city. He should have resigned a while ago, but will not. So it’s time for him to go.
This corruption poses a real threat to the people of the city. He should have resigned a while ago, but will not. So it’s time for him to go.
Reposted by Bram
Guess what company those charging stations would have competed with
Biden-era effort to build a federally funded national network of electric vehicle charging stations mostly along state highways is suspended by the Trump administration
February 7, 2025 at 6:24 AM
Guess what company those charging stations would have competed with
Reposted by Bram
Completely and shamelessly lawless. She has absolutely no jurisdiction—zip, zero, zilch—to issue this order.
BREAKING: Ignoring DOJ’s filing noting that she has no jurisdiction currently over the injunction being appealed (and any broader understanding of law), Cannon orders DOJ to provide her with information by 10a Sunday about the Jan. 6 volume of Smith’s report.
![Date Filed
#
Docket Text
01/11/2025
691
PAPERLESS ORDER as to Waltine Nauta, Carlos De Oliveira. On or before 10 a.m. on January 12, 2025, the United States shall file a supplement to its Opposition to Defendants' Joint Motion for Further Stay in Light of Ongoing Appellate Proceedings 690. The supplement shall indicate whether Volume One of the Final Report directly or indirectly refers, relies, or bears in any respect upon any evidence or argument relevant to any of the charges alleged against Defendants Nauta and De Oliveira in this case. If Volume One contains any of the foregoing, understood liberally, the United States shall so indicate in its public Notice and thereafter file a corresponding sealed, non-ex parte supplement with particularized details, by the same deadline. The Court understands the United States' representation that Volume One does not
"mention Defendants Nauta and De Oliveira or their conduct at issue in this case" [690-2 p. 22]. The Court is also aware of Defendants' belief that Volume One "bears on this pending criminal case" [689 p. 2 n. 1]. The following motions remain pending in this Court and have not been ruled upon: Joint Emergency Motion as to Defendants Nauta and De Oliveira 679; Motion to Intervene and/or Participate as Amicus Curiae by President-Elect Donald J.
Trump 681; and Defendants' Joint Motion for Further Stay as to Pending Motion for Injunctive Relief 689. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 1/11/2025. (AMC) (Entered: 01/11/2025)](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:36eqtmzysqf7wsslczw4uxcd/bafkreiev7iaz5olrbz6fauio2772moehrhk5cuigg75ulfvvffqu5k53ey@jpeg)
January 12, 2025 at 1:42 AM
Completely and shamelessly lawless. She has absolutely no jurisdiction—zip, zero, zilch—to issue this order.
Reposted by Bram
NEW: On Saturday, Judge Cannon, a Trump appointee, issued an order purporting to require DOJ to tell her about Jack Smith's Jan. 6 report — and to do so by 10 a.m. Sunday.
The order is lawless for at least three reasons.
This evening at Law Dork —>
The order is lawless for at least three reasons.
This evening at Law Dork —>
Lawless Cannon orders DOJ to tell her about Jack Smith's January 6 report
The order from the Florida federal judge who dismissed the special counsel's case against Donald Trump is lawless for at least three reasons.
www.lawdork.com
January 12, 2025 at 12:24 AM
NEW: On Saturday, Judge Cannon, a Trump appointee, issued an order purporting to require DOJ to tell her about Jack Smith's Jan. 6 report — and to do so by 10 a.m. Sunday.
The order is lawless for at least three reasons.
This evening at Law Dork —>
The order is lawless for at least three reasons.
This evening at Law Dork —>
Reposted by Bram
c. She has no business asking to see any part of the report because of (a) and (b).
Her orders are completely bonkers.
(2/2)
www.lawdork.com/p/cannon-doj...
Her orders are completely bonkers.
(2/2)
www.lawdork.com/p/cannon-doj...
Lawless Cannon orders DOJ to tell her about Jack Smith's January 6 report
The order from the Florida federal judge who dismissed the special counsel's case against Donald Trump is lawless for at least three reasons.
www.lawdork.com
January 12, 2025 at 3:17 AM
c. She has no business asking to see any part of the report because of (a) and (b).
Her orders are completely bonkers.
(2/2)
www.lawdork.com/p/cannon-doj...
Her orders are completely bonkers.
(2/2)
www.lawdork.com/p/cannon-doj...
Reposted by Bram
The Supreme Court using a completely fabricated harm to justify actual harm towards people who face real discrimination is an apt metaphor for modern conservatism
June 30, 2023 at 2:13 PM
The Supreme Court using a completely fabricated harm to justify actual harm towards people who face real discrimination is an apt metaphor for modern conservatism