I've seen "What is a woman?" used often to challeng inclusive views of womanhood, particularly by those who advocate for a strict biological definition based on sex assigned at birth.

The idea that "sex recognition is our most primal survival instinct" is dubious at best. If we're talking about fundamental survival instincts, something like "don't walk off a cliff" is probably higher on the list—you can’t reproduce if you’re dead.

Today, Trump has:
-indicated he'll purge the FBI of everyone who isn't a fanatical loyalist
-allowed his crony to seize all government funding in an effective coup
-ripped the entire federal government off the internet

Today, Democrats have:
-done nothing
-said nothing
-tweeted about egg prices

There's a particular legal theory rabbit hole I've been going down while taking a good hard look at the trans panic defense. (I've pulled a lot of insight from asking how transmisogynistic phenomena resemble violence against cis women.)

So let's talk about "rough sex" and "nagging and shagging".

It's scary how liberal men will look at antifeminist backlash, say "I can't believe they'd do all of this because women play video games now!" and then instead of taking that seriously, start brainstorming how to lean into male supremacy just enough as a quick fix to keep GamerGate men on the left.

it’s also worth pointing out that bloom may not have even been referring to mtf transsexuals with the term “cross-dressers”
and it’s willfully misleading to suggest that all mtf transsexuals cross-dress or even need to do so to pass

For Terfs: This is a book review of Amy Bloom's Normal, not Dworkin's own personal manifesto. 🗣

Image credit: @bugbearts.bsky.social

We’re about:
✔️ Women’s rights & bodily autonomy
✔️ Ending male violence & oppression
✔️ Gender abolition without trans erasure
✔️ Economic justice for all
🚫 TERFs & misogynists—keep moving. 🚫
#RadicalFeminism #TransRights #FeminismForAll