HSuzumiya6
@hsuzumiya6.bsky.social
Your homegirl is now on BSky now, formerly on twitter as HSuzumiya6developer
https://twitter.com/Hsuzumiya6
🎈22nd January 🎈🎂
https://twitter.com/Hsuzumiya6
🎈22nd January 🎈🎂
Pinned
HSuzumiya6
@hsuzumiya6.bsky.social
· Jun 19
Grok cooked with these 2 mediaeval Daleks perhaps a person who loves DND could make an TTRPG series on YouTube with "Dungeons and Daleks" as an name
Reposted by HSuzumiya6
It is all so anti-science and anti-medicine and that our politics have devolved to this is disgusting.
December 4, 2025 at 10:30 AM
It is all so anti-science and anti-medicine and that our politics have devolved to this is disgusting.
Reposted by HSuzumiya6
Healthy little bodies should not be drugged to stop the development of their healthy little cancers as normal.
Healthy little bodies should not be drugged to stop the tightening of airways as normal.
Healthy little bodies should not be drugged to stop the progression of viruses as normal.
😱
Healthy little bodies should not be drugged to stop the tightening of airways as normal.
Healthy little bodies should not be drugged to stop the progression of viruses as normal.
😱
December 4, 2025 at 10:30 AM
Healthy little bodies should not be drugged to stop the development of their healthy little cancers as normal.
Healthy little bodies should not be drugged to stop the tightening of airways as normal.
Healthy little bodies should not be drugged to stop the progression of viruses as normal.
😱
Healthy little bodies should not be drugged to stop the tightening of airways as normal.
Healthy little bodies should not be drugged to stop the progression of viruses as normal.
😱
Agreed, puberty blockers are used for various cases like precocious puberty
So this Rally is psudeoscientific poppycock
So this Rally is psudeoscientific poppycock
The trial is, of course, clinical nonsense. Puberty blockers are safe for cis kids, after all.
The trial was invented as a pretext to block PBs (for trans kids) in the first place.
But, oh! The hypocrisy of transphobes saying "Can't give children untested [sic] drugs" and "Can't test the drugs"...
The trial was invented as a pretext to block PBs (for trans kids) in the first place.
But, oh! The hypocrisy of transphobes saying "Can't give children untested [sic] drugs" and "Can't test the drugs"...
December 4, 2025 at 10:42 AM
Agreed, puberty blockers are used for various cases like precocious puberty
So this Rally is psudeoscientific poppycock
So this Rally is psudeoscientific poppycock
Reposted by HSuzumiya6
The UK Labour Party, everyone
December 4, 2025 at 10:24 AM
The UK Labour Party, everyone
Reposted by HSuzumiya6
Wow. From sceptic to member!
The Guardian spent an evening with me at Kings College and interviewed the people who came to the Q&A.
Here's what they found 👇🏼
www.theguardian.com/news/audio/2...
The Guardian spent an evening with me at Kings College and interviewed the people who came to the Q&A.
Here's what they found 👇🏼
www.theguardian.com/news/audio/2...
Zack Polanski on the Green party boom – podcast
Three months into his leadership the Green party membership is surging. Randeep Ramesh explains why
www.theguardian.com
December 4, 2025 at 10:37 AM
Wow. From sceptic to member!
The Guardian spent an evening with me at Kings College and interviewed the people who came to the Q&A.
Here's what they found 👇🏼
www.theguardian.com/news/audio/2...
The Guardian spent an evening with me at Kings College and interviewed the people who came to the Q&A.
Here's what they found 👇🏼
www.theguardian.com/news/audio/2...
Reposted by HSuzumiya6
Reposted by HSuzumiya6
Whoever it was, the words ‘legal advice’ is doing an awful lot of heavy lifting.
December 3, 2025 at 2:20 PM
Whoever it was, the words ‘legal advice’ is doing an awful lot of heavy lifting.
Reposted by HSuzumiya6
This is exactly what I was saying to a friend about this today. These organisations have jumped too soon or the have been given advance sight of the outcome of the case possibly in communication amongst “polite friends”🤔
December 3, 2025 at 1:32 PM
This is exactly what I was saying to a friend about this today. These organisations have jumped too soon or the have been given advance sight of the outcome of the case possibly in communication amongst “polite friends”🤔
Reposted by HSuzumiya6
I don’t. But they could have held out until the GLP JR decision comes along in the next few weeks.
If it goes for us, that leaves the WI in the situation of having broken the law. And worse still, is that they’ve burnt their bridges; no trans woman will want to be a part of them after this.
If it goes for us, that leaves the WI in the situation of having broken the law. And worse still, is that they’ve burnt their bridges; no trans woman will want to be a part of them after this.
December 3, 2025 at 1:28 PM
I don’t. But they could have held out until the GLP JR decision comes along in the next few weeks.
If it goes for us, that leaves the WI in the situation of having broken the law. And worse still, is that they’ve burnt their bridges; no trans woman will want to be a part of them after this.
If it goes for us, that leaves the WI in the situation of having broken the law. And worse still, is that they’ve burnt their bridges; no trans woman will want to be a part of them after this.
Reposted by HSuzumiya6
Given their long history of supporting trans rights and their fairly recent assertiveness on the issue, my guess is they’re very genuine when they say that.
Whether they could and should have taken on the legal challenge (ie are they being timid/lacking in courage) is another matter.
Whether they could and should have taken on the legal challenge (ie are they being timid/lacking in courage) is another matter.
December 3, 2025 at 1:32 PM
Given their long history of supporting trans rights and their fairly recent assertiveness on the issue, my guess is they’re very genuine when they say that.
Whether they could and should have taken on the legal challenge (ie are they being timid/lacking in courage) is another matter.
Whether they could and should have taken on the legal challenge (ie are they being timid/lacking in courage) is another matter.
Reposted by HSuzumiya6
Because the Supreme Court ruling is being interpreted to prevent trans inclusion in women-only spaces. A small group of people inside and outside the WI are being bankrolled to challenge the WI’s trans inclusive stance.
December 3, 2025 at 1:23 PM
Because the Supreme Court ruling is being interpreted to prevent trans inclusion in women-only spaces. A small group of people inside and outside the WI are being bankrolled to challenge the WI’s trans inclusive stance.
Reposted by HSuzumiya6
Of course, as we see from the US, Trans rights are only the first casualty. They will come for abortion, equal rights in general, and more. None of these right wing activists are one-issue people.
December 3, 2025 at 12:39 PM
Of course, as we see from the US, Trans rights are only the first casualty. They will come for abortion, equal rights in general, and more. None of these right wing activists are one-issue people.
Reposted by HSuzumiya6
They won't be happy until every women's space becomes a club for GCs only, who sit in rooms, silently, examining crotches for bulges and throats for adams apples, desperately paranoid they are inhaling the scentless poison of testosterone. Appalling, hateful people kmt
December 3, 2025 at 12:38 PM
They won't be happy until every women's space becomes a club for GCs only, who sit in rooms, silently, examining crotches for bulges and throats for adams apples, desperately paranoid they are inhaling the scentless poison of testosterone. Appalling, hateful people kmt
Reposted by HSuzumiya6
"I've never felt safer, thank God trans women are no longer members of a club famous for uplifting women and communities" said no person anywhere, ever
December 3, 2025 at 12:32 PM
"I've never felt safer, thank God trans women are no longer members of a club famous for uplifting women and communities" said no person anywhere, ever
Reposted by HSuzumiya6
So orgs have no agency over their admissions, and are are being forced to oprress people against their own and their members' wishes. If trans women making jam makes you angry please know you're a contemptible degenerate, disliked by everyone with an actual soul
www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025...
www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025...
Women’s Institute will no longer accept trans women as members from April
Exclusive: CEO says decision taken with ‘utmost regret and sadness’ after supreme court ruling on definition of a woman
www.theguardian.com
December 3, 2025 at 12:30 PM
So orgs have no agency over their admissions, and are are being forced to oprress people against their own and their members' wishes. If trans women making jam makes you angry please know you're a contemptible degenerate, disliked by everyone with an actual soul
www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025...
www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025...
Reposted by HSuzumiya6
You made your choice, now we get to make ours.
And for me, I made a solemn promise to myself, in 2022 when you still thought the progressive consensus was unassailable, not to go quietly, not to make it easy on anyone.
I've been steeled against this moment for years.
And for me, I made a solemn promise to myself, in 2022 when you still thought the progressive consensus was unassailable, not to go quietly, not to make it easy on anyone.
I've been steeled against this moment for years.
December 3, 2025 at 11:12 AM
You made your choice, now we get to make ours.
And for me, I made a solemn promise to myself, in 2022 when you still thought the progressive consensus was unassailable, not to go quietly, not to make it easy on anyone.
I've been steeled against this moment for years.
And for me, I made a solemn promise to myself, in 2022 when you still thought the progressive consensus was unassailable, not to go quietly, not to make it easy on anyone.
I've been steeled against this moment for years.
Reposted by HSuzumiya6
Reposted by HSuzumiya6
You have my sympathies! I just have an issue with people attacking powerless institutions that TERFs are bulling into submission. TERFs and the far right agenda is the problem.
December 4, 2025 at 10:12 AM
You have my sympathies! I just have an issue with people attacking powerless institutions that TERFs are bulling into submission. TERFs and the far right agenda is the problem.
Reposted by HSuzumiya6
If these institutions truly believed in inclusion, then they could change their rules to define 'women' for purposes of their membership to be gender inclusive, surely!
December 3, 2025 at 12:31 PM
If these institutions truly believed in inclusion, then they could change their rules to define 'women' for purposes of their membership to be gender inclusive, surely!
Reposted by HSuzumiya6
so what are they gonna do check their undercarriage?
December 3, 2025 at 2:36 PM
so what are they gonna do check their undercarriage?
Reposted by HSuzumiya6
Infiltration and coercion by anti-trans forces, I'd say.
December 3, 2025 at 4:59 PM
Infiltration and coercion by anti-trans forces, I'd say.
Reposted by HSuzumiya6
But under the Supreme Court's vision, trans women aren't women, and so a women's group admitting trans women would no longer be a women's group. So they can either deny trans women, or open up to all sexes. Not great options
December 3, 2025 at 2:16 PM
But under the Supreme Court's vision, trans women aren't women, and so a women's group admitting trans women would no longer be a women's group. So they can either deny trans women, or open up to all sexes. Not great options
Reposted by HSuzumiya6
The Equality Act sets out protections and restrictions on that - ideally, to prevent discrimination e.g. they aren't allowed to deny all Muslim women from becoming members. Under the old interpretation, trans women were classed as women for this purpose - so a "women's group" should accept them
December 3, 2025 at 2:16 PM
The Equality Act sets out protections and restrictions on that - ideally, to prevent discrimination e.g. they aren't allowed to deny all Muslim women from becoming members. Under the old interpretation, trans women were classed as women for this purpose - so a "women's group" should accept them
Reposted by HSuzumiya6
"we have no choice" really seems like you do
December 3, 2025 at 2:14 PM
"we have no choice" really seems like you do
Reposted by HSuzumiya6
On the evidence we have, they probably would. Which means nobody should trust them now.
December 3, 2025 at 11:45 AM
On the evidence we have, they probably would. Which means nobody should trust them now.