Michał Gulczyński
@gulczynski.bsky.social
Max Weber Fellow at the European University Institute | PhD from Bocconi University | Studying mostly gender | @schmorpl.bsky.social | "Przemilczane nierówności. O problemach mężczyzn w Polsce"
Congratulations! It is a super interesting topic!
November 3, 2025 at 2:53 PM
Congratulations! It is a super interesting topic!
Reposted by Michał Gulczyński
Doch, in der Schweiz ist diese Entwicklung sogar fast noch ausgeprägter, ich hatte hierfür mal diese Grafik gebastelt gehabt:
November 2, 2025 at 3:21 PM
Doch, in der Schweiz ist diese Entwicklung sogar fast noch ausgeprägter, ich hatte hierfür mal diese Grafik gebastelt gehabt:
Es ist auch beeindruckend, wie ungleich dieses Prozess in Bezug auf das Geschlecht ist (selbst wenn nicht so stark in der Schweiz).
bsky.app/profile/gulc...
bsky.app/profile/gulc...
Over the last decades, tertiary education has expanded rapidly - especially for women. They have overtaken men in all EU countries and the gaps keep growing in many of them.
In four countries, the gender gap is larger than 20 percentage points.
Are we ready for any egalitarian policies?
In four countries, the gender gap is larger than 20 percentage points.
Are we ready for any egalitarian policies?
November 2, 2025 at 3:11 PM
Es ist auch beeindruckend, wie ungleich dieses Prozess in Bezug auf das Geschlecht ist (selbst wenn nicht so stark in der Schweiz).
bsky.app/profile/gulc...
bsky.app/profile/gulc...
Reposted by Michał Gulczyński
As one reviewer said: “The appendix is a treasure trove of information.”
It has two parts:
1) An Excel table with a detailed description of all studies: concepts and survey items, research questions, results. I tried to make this database easy to search through and filter.
osf.io/fajcy/
5/7
It has two parts:
1) An Excel table with a detailed description of all studies: concepts and survey items, research questions, results. I tried to make this database easy to search through and filter.
osf.io/fajcy/
5/7
OSF
osf.io
October 27, 2025 at 7:42 AM
As one reviewer said: “The appendix is a treasure trove of information.”
It has two parts:
1) An Excel table with a detailed description of all studies: concepts and survey items, research questions, results. I tried to make this database easy to search through and filter.
osf.io/fajcy/
5/7
It has two parts:
1) An Excel table with a detailed description of all studies: concepts and survey items, research questions, results. I tried to make this database easy to search through and filter.
osf.io/fajcy/
5/7
That was very nice, thank you!
October 28, 2025 at 8:29 PM
That was very nice, thank you!
Good to know, I have no complaints! 😀 Thank you for sharing!
October 28, 2025 at 8:28 PM
Good to know, I have no complaints! 😀 Thank you for sharing!
Reposted by Michał Gulczyński
Gender attitudes are likely more important than gender alone.
The literature confirms that hostile and modern sexism played a role in Trump’s election and probably the success of other radical/far-right parties.
3/7
The literature confirms that hostile and modern sexism played a role in Trump’s election and probably the success of other radical/far-right parties.
3/7
October 27, 2025 at 7:42 AM
Gender attitudes are likely more important than gender alone.
The literature confirms that hostile and modern sexism played a role in Trump’s election and probably the success of other radical/far-right parties.
3/7
The literature confirms that hostile and modern sexism played a role in Trump’s election and probably the success of other radical/far-right parties.
3/7
You can find the accepted manuscript on SocArxiv/OSF:
osf.io/preprints/so...
Appendix:
osf.io/fajcy/
7/7
osf.io/preprints/so...
Appendix:
osf.io/fajcy/
7/7
OSF
osf.io
October 27, 2025 at 7:42 AM
You can find the accepted manuscript on SocArxiv/OSF:
osf.io/preprints/so...
Appendix:
osf.io/fajcy/
7/7
osf.io/preprints/so...
Appendix:
osf.io/fajcy/
7/7
2) A discussion of operationalization choices. The variety is stunning and some paper divert from the initial sexism scales or do not specify which type of sexism they study. Luckily, there are some recent studies on the measurement of sexism.
6/7
6/7
October 27, 2025 at 7:42 AM
2) A discussion of operationalization choices. The variety is stunning and some paper divert from the initial sexism scales or do not specify which type of sexism they study. Luckily, there are some recent studies on the measurement of sexism.
6/7
6/7
As one reviewer said: “The appendix is a treasure trove of information.”
It has two parts:
1) An Excel table with a detailed description of all studies: concepts and survey items, research questions, results. I tried to make this database easy to search through and filter.
osf.io/fajcy/
5/7
It has two parts:
1) An Excel table with a detailed description of all studies: concepts and survey items, research questions, results. I tried to make this database easy to search through and filter.
osf.io/fajcy/
5/7
OSF
osf.io
October 27, 2025 at 7:42 AM
As one reviewer said: “The appendix is a treasure trove of information.”
It has two parts:
1) An Excel table with a detailed description of all studies: concepts and survey items, research questions, results. I tried to make this database easy to search through and filter.
osf.io/fajcy/
5/7
It has two parts:
1) An Excel table with a detailed description of all studies: concepts and survey items, research questions, results. I tried to make this database easy to search through and filter.
osf.io/fajcy/
5/7
The findings on benevolent sexism are less clear. I would wish to see more studies on how we can distinguish between its various dimensions (complementary gender differentiation, protective paternalism, heterosexual intimacy) and other gender role attitudes or beliefs.
4/7
4/7
October 27, 2025 at 7:42 AM
The findings on benevolent sexism are less clear. I would wish to see more studies on how we can distinguish between its various dimensions (complementary gender differentiation, protective paternalism, heterosexual intimacy) and other gender role attitudes or beliefs.
4/7
4/7
Gender attitudes are likely more important than gender alone.
The literature confirms that hostile and modern sexism played a role in Trump’s election and probably the success of other radical/far-right parties.
3/7
The literature confirms that hostile and modern sexism played a role in Trump’s election and probably the success of other radical/far-right parties.
3/7
October 27, 2025 at 7:42 AM
Gender attitudes are likely more important than gender alone.
The literature confirms that hostile and modern sexism played a role in Trump’s election and probably the success of other radical/far-right parties.
3/7
The literature confirms that hostile and modern sexism played a role in Trump’s election and probably the success of other radical/far-right parties.
3/7
I identified 97 studies (including 84 after Trump was elected in 2016 and 42 on that election alone).
Most of the papers have been dedicated to the US. I hope the questions included in the recent @ess-survey.bsky.social will lead to many new studies on Europe.
2/7
Most of the papers have been dedicated to the US. I hope the questions included in the recent @ess-survey.bsky.social will lead to many new studies on Europe.
2/7
October 27, 2025 at 7:42 AM
I identified 97 studies (including 84 after Trump was elected in 2016 and 42 on that election alone).
Most of the papers have been dedicated to the US. I hope the questions included in the recent @ess-survey.bsky.social will lead to many new studies on Europe.
2/7
Most of the papers have been dedicated to the US. I hope the questions included in the recent @ess-survey.bsky.social will lead to many new studies on Europe.
2/7