gracioussandie.bsky.social
@gracioussandie.bsky.social
Reposted
They won’t win; we did it legally in CA, we took it to the voters and we approved it overwhelmingly. Unlike the red states who just passed legislation to redistrict. CA followed the law, followed our state constitution and I don’t think a court will see it any other way.
November 13, 2025 at 10:09 PM
Reposted
(Cuomo is another example-- using taxpayer money to smear women he assaulted. But you know that already.)

Point is THEY CANNOT CHANGE, and they cannot be trusted. The only option is to remove them from power.
November 10, 2025 at 4:06 PM
Reposted
He knows what's in them and it will destroy his idea of himself to publicly have it revealed that he has aligned himself with a child rapist.

So he is hiding. Because it is in his self-interest to do it.

And this is but one example of why we have to vet every candidate with a fine-toothed comb.
November 10, 2025 at 4:06 PM
Reposted
Epstein was prosecuted. The system that enabled him was not. The Epstein network depended on liquidity, compliant banks, and political protection. Its architecture remains intact and operating. #OpDeathEaters
November 10, 2025 at 3:53 PM
Reposted
By closing the case prematurely, US officials lost or destroyed the only mechanism capable of mapping Epstein’s financial network in full. #OpDeathEaters
November 10, 2025 at 3:53 PM
Reposted
By halting the financial probe, the Justice Department preserved the boundary between Epstein’s crimes and the institutions that sustained them. Prosecutors had the tools to trace and forfeit assets but were told to stand down. #OpDeathEaters
November 10, 2025 at 3:53 PM
Reposted
Asset forfeiture laws would have allowed prosecutors to trace and recover funds distributed through shell companies, offshore trusts, and domestic partnerships connected to Epstein’s clients. #OpDeathEaters
November 10, 2025 at 3:53 PM
Reposted
A prosecution under federal money laundering statutes could have forced cooperating witnesses, subpoenaed financial institutions, and revealed who managed Epstein’s assets and who knowingly enabled the concealment of proceeds tied to trafficking. #OpDeathEaters
November 10, 2025 at 3:53 PM
Reposted
Stefan Cassella, former Deputy Chief of the DOJ’s Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Section, told reporters that pursuing the case could have exposed additional facilitators and institutions tied to Epstein’s network. #OpDeathEaters
November 10, 2025 at 3:53 PM
Reposted
The money laundering inquiry remained active for 18 months before being closed when Epstein accepted a state-level plea deal in 2008. The unfiled indictment remains sealed. #OpDeathEaters
November 10, 2025 at 3:53 PM
Reposted
Offshore trusts and charitable fronts, C.O.U.Q. Foundation and Enhanced Education Fund, moved money through Virgin Islands accounts and London hedge funds. These mechanisms kept Epstein’s network functional long after his death. #OpDeathEaters
November 10, 2025 at 3:53 PM
Reposted
JPMorgan Chase and Deutsche Bank continued servicing Epstein’s accounts for years. SARs flagged repeated payments to women overseas. Executives classified him as a “high-value client.” Deutsche Bank was later fined $150 million for compliance failures. #OpDeathEaters
November 10, 2025 at 3:53 PM
Reposted
At JPMorgan, senior executives overruled compliance warnings, citing Epstein’s profitability as a “high-value client.” One memo described the risk as “manageable.” Between 2008 - 2013. It also processed over $1 billion in transactions on Epstein's accounts. #OpDeathEaters
November 10, 2025 at 3:53 PM
Reposted
JPMorgan, Deutsche Bank, and others continued servicing Epstein’s accounts after his 2008 conviction. Suspicious-activity reports, highlighting large unexplained cash withdrawals, and transfers to known associates under investigation, were filed, but ignored. #OpDeathEaters
November 10, 2025 at 3:53 PM
Reposted
The same pattern of suppression that protected Epstein’s criminal network also insulated the institutions that managed his finances. Major banks, foundations, and offshore entities formed the backbone of his trafficking operation. #OpDeathEaters
November 10, 2025 at 3:53 PM
Reposted
The contradiction between Acosta’s testimony and the documented record indicates that the financial evidence gathered during the federal probe was deliberately minimized or covered up. #OpDeathEaters
November 10, 2025 at 3:53 PM
Reposted
Acosta personally negotiated Epstein’s 2008 non-prosecution agreement. It granted immunity to “any potential co-conspirators” and ended the federal financial case Villafaña built. DOJ files show it was designed to foreclose further federal inquiry. #OpDeathEaters
November 10, 2025 at 3:53 PM
Reposted
Recovered emails show U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta was copied on briefings about the financial case. Years later, he told Congress he “did not recall” any money-laundering component and insisted focus was only on “Palm Beach conduct.” #OpDeathEaters
November 10, 2025 at 3:53 PM
Reposted
In August 2007, Assistant US Attorney Villafaña contacted Les Wexner, Epstein’s main financial backer. Shortly after learning of the probe Wexner abruptly severed all professional and public ties with Epstein and began restructuring his financial holdings. #OpDeathEaters
November 10, 2025 at 3:53 PM
Reposted
Villafaña’s draft indictment outlined potential charges for money laundering and operating an unlicensed money-transmitting business, but US senior officials halted the filing. The full indictment remains sealed. #OpDeathEaters
November 10, 2025 at 3:53 PM