Gianmarco Daniele
banner
giammacco.bsky.social
Gianmarco Daniele
@giammacco.bsky.social
Associate Prof. University of Milan - CLEAN Unit at Bocconi University
congrats!
October 13, 2025 at 11:17 AM
Why? Likely a bundled effect: better health, work, and rehab programs—enabled by scale. Fewer women in male prisons = fewer services. Policy changes could cut recidivism system-wide.
May 14, 2025 at 11:08 AM
Using this distance-based rule as an instrument, we isolate exogenous variation in prison assignment. Our data (2012–2022) show that women-only prisons reduce 3-year recidivism by up to 16pp.
May 14, 2025 at 11:08 AM
We (with @fracalamunci.bsky.social, Giovanni Mastrobuoni, Daniele Terlizzese) compare women-only prisons to female sections in male facilities.
As cross-country comparisons are tricky, we use quasi-random inmate assignment in Italy, where prison choice balances distance from home and prison type.
May 14, 2025 at 11:08 AM
The number of women in prison has surged 60% since 2000—but we still don’t know what works better for rehabilitation. Generally, there is little research on incarcerated women.
May 14, 2025 at 11:08 AM
Around the world, women serve time in either women-only prisons or female sections of male prisons.
14% of the global population lives in countries with only mixed-gender prisons, 30% in countries with only women-only prisons, and 54% in countries with both.
May 14, 2025 at 11:08 AM
Reposted by Gianmarco Daniele
grossly incompetent to voters -- who would then have less reason to desert it. As is usually the case, stronger constraint *reduce* the cost of voting for "bad" politicians.
There is, in fact, another twist to this argument. Citizens may well have incentives www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
Does the winner take it all? Federal policies and political extremism
Whether citizens like or dislike federal policies often depends on regional differences. Because of geography, (economic) history or other path-depend…
www.sciencedirect.com
April 17, 2025 at 9:18 AM