Click to view
frankenfurtered.bsky.social
Click to view
@frankenfurtered.bsky.social
East coast
Reposted by Click to view
your ignorance to the situation at hand should not embolden you to tell others that they are in the wrong. read through my feed, or salty’s, or bree’s. understand what the actual harm is that jesse singal is causing rather than scolding those of us who want better.
December 14, 2024 at 5:17 AM
Reposted by Click to view
or B: their employer who signs their paychecks, can override their decisions, is not experienced in identifying when they're being played, and is insulated from consequences of their actions by everyone's tendency to loudly and aggressively blame person A and direct the abuse in their direction?
December 9, 2024 at 1:11 AM
There's a curious block from me making a cheeky comment. Curious
December 11, 2024 at 6:48 AM
Reposted by Click to view
To be honest, if it's really a dead heat, shouldn't people be loading up the money on Kamala? 150% return for a coin flip is a golden opportunity
October 31, 2024 at 9:19 PM
Reposted by Click to view
A judicial appointment.
October 31, 2024 at 9:08 PM
Reposted by Click to view
Border patrol and ICE made policy decisions that chevron deference allowed. Also EPA waived rules for the wall that courts allowed due to chevron
October 31, 2024 at 9:11 PM
Reposted by Click to view
This is inside baseball so people might sleep on it but this is a five-alarm fire in the making. If judges claim the ability to pass constitutional judgement on congressional procedure we don't have an independent legislature anymore. We're talking full blown constitutional crisis.
A Trump judge just ruled that Congress' 2023 appropriations act is unconstitutional because it was passed with proxy voting.

But the Constitution says the House "may determine the Rules of its Proceedings" ... storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
February 27, 2024 at 11:55 PM
Reposted by Click to view
My thrice weekly question: “So what are we going to do about the fact that a shockingly large portion of the federal judiciary doesn’t believe in modern government?”
A Trump judge just ruled that Congress' 2023 appropriations act is unconstitutional because it was passed with proxy voting.

But the Constitution says the House "may determine the Rules of its Proceedings" ... storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
February 27, 2024 at 10:43 PM
Reposted by Click to view
And while this Trump judge says the entire 2023 appropriations act was unconstitutional, his remedy is ... an injunction against the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act? We are fully through the looking glass.
February 27, 2024 at 10:15 PM