Foxdie
LightNews LightNews
banner
foxdie.bsky.social
Foxdie
@foxdie.bsky.social
540 followers 730 following 2.9K posts
Loving Cat Dad

Yaoi Hole Truther

Trans harm researcher
Posts Replies Media Videos
foxdie.bsky.social
Love that a 2012 paper called the false separation of sexgender out, without even acknowledging trans people, and now a bunch of shitty healthcare standards exist that cite it to say "the distinction between sex and gender isn't as clear as you might assume!" And then go on to do biology v identity
Screenshot from referenced paper. It reads: There are two basic tenets to our argument. First, sex is not a biological mechanism and its use as a proxy for other measures does little to further the understanding of health-related research questions. Second, in the vast majority of health research, “sex” and “gender” are entangled and analyses should proceed by assuming that measures of sex are not pristine, but include effects of gender. Screenshot from referenced paper: The IOM, drawing especially on definitions advanced by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the style manual of the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), defines sex as “The classification of living things, generally as male or female according to their reproductive organs and functions assigned by chromosomal complement” and gender as “A person’s self- representation as male or female, or how that person is respon- ded to by social institutions based on the individual’s gender presentation. Gender is rooted in biology and shaped by environ- ment and experience” ((Wizemann & Pardue, 2001) p.17). These definitions lend a superficial sense that sex and gender are distinct domains, even as they give causal and temporal priority to biology (“gender is rooted in biology” but sex is presumably pristine and emerges regardless of environment and experience) Screenshot from referenced paper: We approach sex/gender in this intersectional light and conceptualize sex/gender as a domain of complex phenomena that are simultaneously biological and social, rather than a domain in which the social and biological “overlap.” We use the term gender (read: gender-not-sex) to draw attention to specifically social and structural factors, such as patterns in the distribution of family responsibilities, formal and informal sanctions for gender non- conforming behavior, and so on (For recent, in-depth analyses that support the claim that these patterns cannot be attributed to “original” differences between males and females, see (Fine, 2010; Jordan-Young, 2010; Jordan-Young & Rumiati, forthcoming)). We avoid the use of the term sex (read: “sex-not-gender”) as a stand- alone indicator of biology, or as a broad reference to males and females (as in “sex differences”) because it is rarely specific enough to guide particular investigations, and because it is too easily confused with the more accurate composite phenomenon of sex/ gender that we use here. Further, the direction of influence should not be assumed to flow from an idealized version of “pure” biology outward to the behav- ioral and social world.
November 14, 2025 at 1:30 AM
foxdie.bsky.social
Found the one with his username in. Again, content warning for extreme anti black racism involving race science bs
Screenshot of a Reddit comment by DrWillPowers. It reads: Based God. Also, Africans are genetically superior sprinters due to alpha-1-actinin mutations (Okay to say?)
October 8, 2025 at 10:44 PM
foxdie.bsky.social
I definitely have one with his user name proving it's him in the crop and fairly sure I archived it but I switched phones so I need to recharge it. This is what it said (it appears to have been removed by the fucking r/truscum mods for being too much for even them)

CW anti black racism
A screenshot of a Reddit comment from Dr Will Powers in the r/truscum subreddit. It reads Based God. Also, Africans are genetically superior sprinters due to alpha-1-actinin mutations (Okay to say?)
October 8, 2025 at 10:25 PM
foxdie.bsky.social
Just thought about the "trans positive" exhibit that opened with "sex and gender are different, sex is biological gender is feelings" again.
Screenshot of a dril Tweet. It reads: @Dril getting brain damage from pissing my self off
October 1, 2025 at 11:16 PM
foxdie.bsky.social
I think it is bad that the US president is posting fake, AI generated videos of him on fox news promising all citizens access to a non existent Qanon promoted technology
Image of Norman Rockwell's Freedom of Speech painting
September 28, 2025 at 10:48 AM
foxdie.bsky.social
From Transactuals trans segregation in practice

Does this sound like fair or equitable access?

transactual.org.uk/wp-content/u...
“I, a trans woman, believed I had to follow the EHRC interim update and was followed into the men’s room by a male security officer and told to get out. It is worth noting that before this I was already shaking with fear about the possible confrontation that could ensue. The security man and the two other men in the room circled me. I said I believed, according to what the EHRC and our political leaders have said, that I have to be in there now. Now that he infers I am trans, he starts sniggering at me. The other men in the room join him in laughing at me. I tell him that it isn’t funny and please stop laughing at me. He doesn’t stop and I say “it might be funny to you but to me this is my life and I am scared, scared about being attacked, please stop laughing, it’s not funny’. He tells me he doesn’t care what I have to say, that I need to get out. So I do. I leave and talk to the store manager, where again, I have to relay all sorts of intimate and private details, of my background, my trans and intersex statuses, history of being assaulted, my genital configuration. This is humiliating. I felt deeply unsafe, humiliated, hopeless - like nobody cares, violated. I don’t think the EHRC lets me use the [service of my gender] so I was just denied service.” WHITE TRANS WOMAN WHO FACED ISSUES IN A SHOP OR SHOPPING CENTRE IN ENGLAND
September 27, 2025 at 1:31 PM
foxdie.bsky.social
Public opinion looks great!
Screenshot of a yougov poll. It asks "From what you have seen or heard, do you support or oppose the proposal to introduce a digital ID card system in Britain?" 14% Strongly Support 28% Somewhat Support 15% Somewhat Oppose 30% Strongly Oppose 14% Don't Know
September 26, 2025 at 3:51 PM
foxdie.bsky.social
I think digital ID is bad
Image of Norman Rockwell's Freedom of Speech painting.
September 26, 2025 at 1:13 PM
foxdie.bsky.social
Gun knowing friends have suggested that the casings for used are big enough- about 3 inches long X 0.5 diameter. Obviously still a bit 🤨 but not completely unbelievable.

Pic as ref.
Photo of 5 .30-06 calibre bullets like the kind the alleged Kirk shooter allegedly used.
September 19, 2025 at 11:36 AM
foxdie.bsky.social
In fact it was actually made explicitly clear that these questions should be asked based on subjects self report and not "interviewer assigned sex"
Please take into account that because of the routing, only people identifying as a woman will be asked this item – so the feminine form of “you” should be used here, if applicable in your language
September 16, 2025 at 12:05 PM
foxdie.bsky.social
In fact, it specified that people should be asked according to self report!
Please take into account that because of the routing, only people identifying as a woman will be asked this item – so the feminine form of “you” should be used here, if applicable in your languag
September 16, 2025 at 11:57 AM
foxdie.bsky.social
As per here:
Please take into account that because of the routing, only people identifying as a woman will be asked this item – so the feminine form of “you” should be used here, if applicable in your languag
September 16, 2025 at 11:56 AM
foxdie.bsky.social
Just saw the BBC article and this is some of the most disingenuous reporting I've seen and it's not a small contest!
Screenshot from a BBC article about vandalism of the hill horse. It reads: Thousands of St George's flags have appeared across England in recent months. While some football fans were flying them to cheer on the Lionesses during the 2025 Euros, many more flags have gone up in recent weeks. Some groups responsible for putting them up have told BBC News they are motivated by pride and patriotism
September 9, 2025 at 4:27 PM
foxdie.bsky.social
Interestingly Glinner apparently just tried to do that last question, but to ask what "transgender" means.
September 5, 2025 at 4:15 PM
foxdie.bsky.social
The BBC style guide apparently agrees with him, as I discovered yesterday 🫠
A screenshot of part of the BBC style guide. It reads: Generally avoid the term "trans child/children" or "transgender child/children", unless attributed.
September 4, 2025 at 10:06 AM
foxdie.bsky.social
For reference this is what he wrote about Sarah (I have blanked out where he misgenders her)
On Saturday 8th July spoke at London's Trans Pride rally and made a speech which openly incited violence against women. "I was gonna come here and be really fluffy and be really nice and say yeah be really lovely and queer and gay. Nah. If you see a terf punch them in the fucking face." Metropolitan police officers were in attendance but did not take any action. Despite numerous complaints, the Met continued not to take any action. According to a post on Mumsnet, a user of the site reported the incident to the Met and received a swift reply stating that the matter would not be taken any further. The response referred to Baker as a 'female' and seemed to suggest that inciting violence against women was acceptable because those women were `TERFS'. However, The Daily Mail later reported a statement from the Met Police: "We are aware of a video filmed in Westminster on Saturday, 8 July showing a speaker making remarks during the Trans Pride event... The case was initially closed with no further action. This has been reviewed and the crime report has been re-opened. Enquiries remain ongoing" Eventually, amid a public outcry and following an intervention by Home Secretary, Suella Braverman, Baker was arrested and charged with using threatening or abusive words or behaviour with intent to cause harassment alarm and distress. The charge was later altered to the more serious offence of intentionally encouraging the commission of an offence, namely assault by beating.
September 4, 2025 at 1:37 AM
foxdie.bsky.social
Section 29B of the public order act covers the publication of words intended to incite hatred and violence on the grounds of sexual orientation.

This is Robert Jenrick apparently admitting that gender critical beliefs incite hatred and violence against trans people.
Screenshot from a telegraph article. It reads: Robert Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary, said: “Section 29B of the Public Order Act does not apply to trans identity – that would basically outlaw gender-critical beliefs.
September 3, 2025 at 11:59 AM
foxdie.bsky.social
May I make a weapon suggestion:
Photo of a knife with a union flag handle.
September 2, 2025 at 9:12 AM
foxdie.bsky.social
Literally just this.
Two images side by side. The image on the left is a pixelated photo of Barack Obama. The image on the right is an "enhanced" version of the pixelated Obama image. It has turned Obama into some random white guy.
September 1, 2025 at 7:58 PM
foxdie.bsky.social
Here:
Screenshot of a tweet by George Monbiot. It reads: Now we need an inquiry into the systematic mistreatment and abuse of ME/CFS patients, a massive scandal affecting far greater numbers of people than the poorly-evidenced Gender Identity Development Services (important as that issue is). Where's the major government investigation?… — George Monbiot (@GeorgeMonbiot) April 10, 2024
August 27, 2025 at 6:12 PM
foxdie.bsky.social
I just found a post on on Reddit from 9 months ago about the Healthwatch survey. there were 2 commenters who accurately predicted this would be used to launder the "NHS records biological sex", despite another commenter claiming they could vouch for the lead researcher and they were a trans ally 🫠🫠🫠
A screenshot from a Reddit thread about the Healthwatch survey. Mimthewitch: I had a look at this. I'm concerned that it is trying to gather evidence for their drive to make sure we are all easily identified on our medical records. Ties in with Weasel Streetings plan to ban trans women from hospital wards. I'd be very wary about filling it in. Provides information useful to the enemy. I have zero trust in these people. Another Reddit screenshot of a comment. SilenceWillFall48: This was my response to the section on markers in NHS records. You may like to respond with something similar: “I strongly oppose any change that would make my assigned sex at birth visible in my NHS records without my explicit consent. After years of effort to obtain my Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC) and update my NHS records to reflect my gender as female, I am deeply concerned that allowing assigned sex at birth to be visible to NHS staff would lead to discrimination and harmful healthcare outcomes. Firstly, my primary concern is privacy and the risk of discrimination. I have experienced mistreatment from clinicians and GP practices in the past, prior to updating my records. Revealing my assigned sex at birth would only bring back those experiences and expose me to the same bias and mistreatment. The fear of being treated differently, or even being denied appropriate care, far outweighs any potential benefit of separating gender and sex markers. Moreover, making this information visible would exacerbate my gender dysphoria and increase the risk of healthcare professionals treating me according to male-specific protocols, even against my consent. For example, it could lead to missed breast cancer screenings or inappropriate male-oriented emergency care, like cardiac arrest procedures, where my needs as a female patient could be overlooked. As for prostate cancer, testosterone blockers that I take as part of my hormone therapy significantly reduce my risk of developing it. Therefore, the hypothetical benefits of tracking prostate cancer are far outweighed by the risks of reintroducing this painful aspect of my medical history. In summary, I am satisfied with my NHS gender marker indicating that I am female. I do not support separating gender and sex on my medical records, as it would lead to more harm than benefit in both my healthcare outcomes and personal well-being.”
July 25, 2025 at 7:01 PM
foxdie.bsky.social
FUCK YOU THIS CAN BE ACHIEVED (AND APPARENTLY NOW HAS BEEN IN SYSTEMS) BY HAVING A TICK BOX TO OPT IN. INSISTING THAT ACTUALLY NO YOU CANT CHANGE YOUR RECORDS AND IN SOME POINT IN THE FUTURE MAYBE WE'LL ALLOW AN OPTIONAL IDENTITY FIELD IS NOT APPROPRIATE AND WILL PREVENT PEOPLE SEEKING CARE
Screenshot from the healthwatch report. It reads: Recommendations • Trans and non-binary people should be protected from a loss of sex-specific healthcare (such as invitations for screening) if they change their gender. This should be done by: o Ceasing the practice of giving people a new GP record and NHS number if people change their gender marker o Introducing as soon as possible a single record to cover both biological sex and any change to gender identity This should be done in a way that gives patients privacy, dignity and recognition of their gender but that ensures clinicians can view the patient’s sex and tailor clinical care accordingly, if relevant o Retaining access to sex-specific screening programmes
July 25, 2025 at 10:28 AM
foxdie.bsky.social
In the UK it's class C + schedule 4 so whilst some restrictions much less than ADHD meds for example.

bnf.nice.org.uk/medicines-gu...
Screenshot from link. It reads: Part II includes androgenic and anabolic steroids, clenbuterol, chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG), non-human chorionic gonadotrophin, somatotropin, somatrem, and somatropin. Controlled drug prescription requirements do not apply and Schedule 4 Controlled Drugs are not subject to safe custody requirements. Records in registers do not need to be kept (except in the case of Sativex®).
July 4, 2025 at 3:24 PM
foxdie.bsky.social
Can you explain what part of this post is insulting?
A screenshot of a post from @darkeden21 that reads: Why have I been waiting 461 weeks and 1 day for an appointment with a GIC? Why is Labour committed to making that somehow worse?
June 18, 2025 at 12:14 PM
foxdie.bsky.social
Fuck Churchill racist scum
Screenshot from article. It reads: The justifiable fury that is provoked when people use his statue as a platform for their protests speaks to the deep and enduring love that all decent British people have for Sir Winston.
May 7, 2025 at 8:52 AM