Florida Lib 🇺🇸
@florida-lib.bsky.social
4th amendment maximalist
Seems like a joke
December 1, 2025 at 9:56 PM
Seems like a joke
I truly struggle to understand the conservative moral code. They will excuse anything, and then suddenly get hung up on some violation or failure. When does this happen? I can't predict. What changed? I have no idea.
December 1, 2025 at 5:31 PM
I truly struggle to understand the conservative moral code. They will excuse anything, and then suddenly get hung up on some violation or failure. When does this happen? I can't predict. What changed? I have no idea.
I think the advantage here is simplicity. You can't tune very much before you lose that.
December 1, 2025 at 4:27 PM
I think the advantage here is simplicity. You can't tune very much before you lose that.
Take 3 minutes to familiarize yourself with our best long-term path out of gerrymandering
The Shortest-Splitline Algorithm: a Gerrymandering Solution [Bonus Video]
YouTube video by CGP Grey
youtu.be
December 1, 2025 at 4:02 PM
Take 3 minutes to familiarize yourself with our best long-term path out of gerrymandering
I just don't think this is true.
November 30, 2025 at 6:38 PM
I just don't think this is true.
Reposted by Florida Lib 🇺🇸
"Some have said it's extortion, others claim it is extortion (good)"
November 29, 2025 at 1:10 AM
"Some have said it's extortion, others claim it is extortion (good)"
I will say that being a practicing lawyer can be a hang up to this given the need to regularly adopt positions based on the interests of your clients.
November 29, 2025 at 4:59 PM
That's not a counterpoint.
You think this is an argument about whether training to practice law is good or bad. It's not.
This is an argument about whether training to practice law is useful or counterproductive for Stancil's specific recommendation here.
You think this is an argument about whether training to practice law is good or bad. It's not.
This is an argument about whether training to practice law is useful or counterproductive for Stancil's specific recommendation here.
November 29, 2025 at 4:55 PM
That's not a counterpoint.
You think this is an argument about whether training to practice law is good or bad. It's not.
This is an argument about whether training to practice law is useful or counterproductive for Stancil's specific recommendation here.
You think this is an argument about whether training to practice law is good or bad. It's not.
This is an argument about whether training to practice law is useful or counterproductive for Stancil's specific recommendation here.
They're not saying it's inherently immoral. They're saying it's training that runs counter to the idea sticking to a viewpoint and never deviating.
November 29, 2025 at 4:31 PM
They're not saying it's inherently immoral. They're saying it's training that runs counter to the idea sticking to a viewpoint and never deviating.
Reposted by Florida Lib 🇺🇸
The people pointing out this is yet another example of Republicans only taking bigotry seriously when it affects them directly are right—but this state senator is still showing more spine and self-respect than most Republicans these days. It’s an extremely low bar but also, this is a good sign.
November 28, 2025 at 9:11 PM
The people pointing out this is yet another example of Republicans only taking bigotry seriously when it affects them directly are right—but this state senator is still showing more spine and self-respect than most Republicans these days. It’s an extremely low bar but also, this is a good sign.
Reposted by Florida Lib 🇺🇸
I'm not talking about international law. They can, should, and hopefully will be (in 2029) tried under the UCMJ.
November 28, 2025 at 7:25 PM
I'm not talking about international law. They can, should, and hopefully will be (in 2029) tried under the UCMJ.