flanl3
@flanl3.bsky.social
(Not the first time it's been like this, just the most glaring)
December 18, 2025 at 10:47 PM
(Not the first time it's been like this, just the most glaring)
Also, this is Los Angeles - we don't have Blvds, we have Bls
December 15, 2025 at 11:35 PM
Also, this is Los Angeles - we don't have Blvds, we have Bls
that's actually perfect. they're calling 2026 the Year Of Music. it's gonna be the year where there's music
December 4, 2025 at 6:48 PM
that's actually perfect. they're calling 2026 the Year Of Music. it's gonna be the year where there's music
LA has ~8-10 stations downtown, depending where you draw the lines. And then also has Downtown Santa Monica, Downtown Inglewood, Downtown Long Beach, and Azusa Downtown stations
November 28, 2025 at 7:46 PM
LA has ~8-10 stations downtown, depending where you draw the lines. And then also has Downtown Santa Monica, Downtown Inglewood, Downtown Long Beach, and Azusa Downtown stations
You'll note the literal opening clause of my comment.
November 15, 2025 at 4:22 AM
You'll note the literal opening clause of my comment.
I don't like a lot of officials' approach to this, but I think it's pretty misleading to brand delay as a City-invented strategy when delayed effectuation is literally written into the bill (and the subject City Planning report is pretty much just factually about what options the bill provides)
November 15, 2025 at 2:25 AM
I don't like a lot of officials' approach to this, but I think it's pretty misleading to brand delay as a City-invented strategy when delayed effectuation is literally written into the bill (and the subject City Planning report is pretty much just factually about what options the bill provides)
🫡 looking forward to it as always. Offer will stand if you ever need it (although I'm sure you have the audience to find plenty of people who could and would help)
November 10, 2025 at 8:56 PM
🫡 looking forward to it as always. Offer will stand if you ever need it (although I'm sure you have the audience to find plenty of people who could and would help)
Can I ask whether this is a one-off graphic or work for a new video? I've got some knowledge with the Zoning Code and could maybe answer a couple questions, if needed
November 10, 2025 at 8:38 PM
Can I ask whether this is a one-off graphic or work for a new video? I've got some knowledge with the Zoning Code and could maybe answer a couple questions, if needed
Holy shit are you ever
October 28, 2025 at 5:55 AM
Holy shit are you ever
If that's really the final location, it's more segregating people who actually use Union Station vs people who visit once to check out the VenHub
October 24, 2025 at 8:34 AM
If that's really the final location, it's more segregating people who actually use Union Station vs people who visit once to check out the VenHub
Plus, Amtrak says this
October 22, 2025 at 4:08 PM
Plus, Amtrak says this
I can't imagine so since there's no seatbelts? Unless I'm misremembering how car seats work
October 22, 2025 at 4:08 PM
I can't imagine so since there's no seatbelts? Unless I'm misremembering how car seats work
I mostly don't mind this but the word order choice here gives me pause
October 21, 2025 at 7:16 AM
I mostly don't mind this but the word order choice here gives me pause
We've got nobody for DFW on www.transitruns.org yet, we could use a first!
Home
- TransitRuns
TransitRuns is a global database of times for transit speedrunning - the pursuit of visiting all stations on a public transit system as fast as possible.
www.transitruns.org
October 14, 2025 at 5:59 AM
We've got nobody for DFW on www.transitruns.org yet, we could use a first!
I can't believe siivagunner broke the jetsons ban to upload your rip. Because it was the funniest thing even
September 25, 2025 at 10:16 PM
I can't believe siivagunner broke the jetsons ban to upload your rip. Because it was the funniest thing even
In fact, if you require it every day, I don't think a single station in the state reaches the 36 threshold for very high frequency (tier 1) commuter rail. This could not possibly have been the intention (although intended meaning vs text on the page will be a persistent issue with this law)
September 24, 2025 at 10:07 PM
In fact, if you require it every day, I don't think a single station in the state reaches the 36 threshold for very high frequency (tier 1) commuter rail. This could not possibly have been the intention (although intended meaning vs text on the page will be a persistent issue with this law)
An alternate charitable reading: they were possibly included for "exploratory purposes", to show an eventual picture of what SB 79 could look like in the city in final implementation.
Of course, if that's true, it's still irresponsible to put out a map where they look just as final as existing stns
Of course, if that's true, it's still irresponsible to put out a map where they look just as final as existing stns
September 24, 2025 at 8:46 PM
An alternate charitable reading: they were possibly included for "exploratory purposes", to show an eventual picture of what SB 79 could look like in the city in final implementation.
Of course, if that's true, it's still irresponsible to put out a map where they look just as final as existing stns
Of course, if that's true, it's still irresponsible to put out a map where they look just as final as existing stns
The Metrolink readings on this map are bonkers - clicking around on the storymap, it seems that Van Nuys was explicitly included on a *Metrolink* basis in addition to ESFV - a treatment Chatsworth and Sylmar/San Fernando didn't get. I have no clue how that conclusion could've been reached
September 24, 2025 at 8:42 PM
The Metrolink readings on this map are bonkers - clicking around on the storymap, it seems that Van Nuys was explicitly included on a *Metrolink* basis in addition to ESFV - a treatment Chatsworth and Sylmar/San Fernando didn't get. I have no clue how that conclusion could've been reached
Good to know, I'd still love to see the city, HCD, or a court be asked & give an official reading
September 24, 2025 at 8:40 PM
Good to know, I'd still love to see the city, HCD, or a court be asked & give an official reading
Either way, in this case I'm just calling it of-note that they've not included them. Not committing to one way or the other being correct
September 24, 2025 at 8:30 PM
Either way, in this case I'm just calling it of-note that they've not included them. Not committing to one way or the other being correct