existwell
@existwell.bsky.social
Science of psychedelics & other altered states of consciousness
Center for Psychedelic and Consciousness Research
@jhpsychedelics.bsky.social
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Oxford Uehiro Institute
Yaden Lab
www.YadenLab.com
Center for Psychedelic and Consciousness Research
@jhpsychedelics.bsky.social
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Oxford Uehiro Institute
Yaden Lab
www.YadenLab.com
Reposted by existwell
I think we can show that people with delusions vs people with lots of esoteric beliefs both have aberrant prediction errors, but for very different neurobiological reasons: one bottom up (patients) and one top-down (psychics)
September 30, 2025 at 3:25 PM
I think we can show that people with delusions vs people with lots of esoteric beliefs both have aberrant prediction errors, but for very different neurobiological reasons: one bottom up (patients) and one top-down (psychics)
exciting! can we request a mysterious indecipherable preview?
agreed about the profound psychological impact of getting new data to analyze...
agreed about the profound psychological impact of getting new data to analyze...
September 30, 2025 at 3:17 PM
exciting! can we request a mysterious indecipherable preview?
agreed about the profound psychological impact of getting new data to analyze...
agreed about the profound psychological impact of getting new data to analyze...
I think Feltz & Cokely could say something like: if responses to the question in your study are systematically swayed by personality, then that introduces an obstacle to agreement, since these operative reasons couldn't be articulated.
(this ^ is a more minimal take on their much broader argument)
(this ^ is a more minimal take on their much broader argument)
September 29, 2025 at 8:52 PM
I think Feltz & Cokely could say something like: if responses to the question in your study are systematically swayed by personality, then that introduces an obstacle to agreement, since these operative reasons couldn't be articulated.
(this ^ is a more minimal take on their much broader argument)
(this ^ is a more minimal take on their much broader argument)
thank you for letting me know! I tagged them in a post on the thread as well-
September 29, 2025 at 6:12 PM
thank you for letting me know! I tagged them in a post on the thread as well-
Book by Feltz & Cokely @ethicalinteraction.bsky.social
The book is OpenAccess, so can be accessed for free here!
link.springer.com/book/10.1007...
The book is OpenAccess, so can be accessed for free here!
link.springer.com/book/10.1007...
Diversity and Disagreement
This book details the discovery and exploration of one of the major scientific revelations that has emerged from the field of experimental philosophy
link.springer.com
September 29, 2025 at 5:14 PM
Book by Feltz & Cokely @ethicalinteraction.bsky.social
The book is OpenAccess, so can be accessed for free here!
link.springer.com/book/10.1007...
The book is OpenAccess, so can be accessed for free here!
link.springer.com/book/10.1007...
(Also, there may be a meeting on this book and the overall topic at Hopkins in the future. Please let me know if interested!)
September 29, 2025 at 4:44 PM
(Also, there may be a meeting on this book and the overall topic at Hopkins in the future. Please let me know if interested!)
