⚡Preserves weak/transient TF binding without signal loss
⚡Better signal-to-noise & resolution
⚡Works for all TFs (high and low DNA-binding affinity) & histone marks
⚡Low-input needed, bulk or single-cell, scalable to multi-cellular systems (4/7)
⚡Preserves weak/transient TF binding without signal loss
⚡Better signal-to-noise & resolution
⚡Works for all TFs (high and low DNA-binding affinity) & histone marks
⚡Low-input needed, bulk or single-cell, scalable to multi-cellular systems (4/7)
💡 Enter #DynaTag: ‘Dynamic targets and Tagmentation’ captures transient TF-DNA interactions that standard CUT&Tag misses.
The trick? Sample prep under physiological salt stabilizes specific interactions without promoting untargeted tagmentation 🧂 (3/7)
💡 Enter #DynaTag: ‘Dynamic targets and Tagmentation’ captures transient TF-DNA interactions that standard CUT&Tag misses.
The trick? Sample prep under physiological salt stabilizes specific interactions without promoting untargeted tagmentation 🧂 (3/7)
Our newly developed DynaTag is faster, cleaner, more sensitive than #ChIPseq, #CUT&RUN and #CUT&Tag.
🔗 Our @natcomms.nature.com paper: www.nature.com/articles/s41...
🧵Let’s break down what makes DynaTag so powerful (1/7)
Our newly developed DynaTag is faster, cleaner, more sensitive than #ChIPseq, #CUT&RUN and #CUT&Tag.
🔗 Our @natcomms.nature.com paper: www.nature.com/articles/s41...
🧵Let’s break down what makes DynaTag so powerful (1/7)