I was fully expecting it to end with an Onlyfans link 🙈

www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2025/1...

Bonus points for putting an emoji in the title 🍦

As in, the model produces the same output when seeing the same feature in both half-maps, not that the output has meaningful information. You'd need to figure out the poses of some particles you've got high-res structures of (ribosomes! 😍) and calculate the FSC against those structures.

Beautiful! I wonder what fraction of this year's cryoET EMDB entries this will account for. Also thank you for formatting the preprint so nicely!

Pros ask CS for the PDF figure with vector graphics and edit it in Illustrator

*these slices 🤓

The 1966 edition was only $13

That's the second book I'm getting because of you over the last 2 days

What protein is that?

I think O1 is initiated by the future employer more often than not. It costs a lot more in lawyer fees, which, to my understanding, is why universities rarely sponsor it. Some postdocs would pass the professional visibility requirement, but it would be hard to argue the flashiness of their position.

Is H1B prevalent below faculty level? Many faculty hires would easily qualify for O1, and the legal costs for that are well below 100k

Physicists (and, more recently, techies) are kind of famous for underestimating the effort required for understanding biology. Sure it's easy to look once all the work to make a result visible has been done.

Sounds like it's just an incentive for more lobbyism and campaign donations

I'm curious if it's the SGD with minibatches helping here, or just the very slow, controlled increase in assumed resolution.