Luciano Rila
@drtrapezio.bsky.social
Admissions tutor at UCL Maths. LGBTQ+ in STEM. He/Him.
Hey hey! It’s all good, thanks! I’m now admissions tutor at UCL maths. How are things with you?
July 6, 2025 at 3:20 PM
Hey hey! It’s all good, thanks! I’m now admissions tutor at UCL maths. How are things with you?
Very well deserved! Congratulations!
June 24, 2025 at 7:35 AM
Very well deserved! Congratulations!
It’s a lovely question!
June 19, 2025 at 4:17 PM
It’s a lovely question!
This is great, thanks for sharing! There’s a new queer network for mathematicians @qedmathsnetwork.bsky.social
June 3, 2025 at 8:46 AM
This is great, thanks for sharing! There’s a new queer network for mathematicians @qedmathsnetwork.bsky.social
Not only does he know about sin, he also knows about cos.
May 10, 2025 at 4:43 AM
Not only does he know about sin, he also knows about cos.
All the best! Thank you for talking to my students about your research
May 9, 2025 at 2:37 PM
All the best! Thank you for talking to my students about your research
Reposted by Luciano Rila
Also:
🔵 The Sullivan Review is not a peer-reviewed research output, it's a savvy piece of Sex Matters campaigning.
🔵 Where is the evidence that current datasets are 'corrupted' by public authorities' long-established approach to the collection, analysis and use of sex and gender data?
🔵 The Sullivan Review is not a peer-reviewed research output, it's a savvy piece of Sex Matters campaigning.
🔵 Where is the evidence that current datasets are 'corrupted' by public authorities' long-established approach to the collection, analysis and use of sex and gender data?
May 7, 2025 at 2:42 PM
Also:
🔵 The Sullivan Review is not a peer-reviewed research output, it's a savvy piece of Sex Matters campaigning.
🔵 Where is the evidence that current datasets are 'corrupted' by public authorities' long-established approach to the collection, analysis and use of sex and gender data?
🔵 The Sullivan Review is not a peer-reviewed research output, it's a savvy piece of Sex Matters campaigning.
🔵 Where is the evidence that current datasets are 'corrupted' by public authorities' long-established approach to the collection, analysis and use of sex and gender data?