ddemaris.bsky.social
@ddemaris.bsky.social
Transients! We love to see it. I think I need to look for a review covering recent work on transients in high dimensional nonlinear dynamical systems. It was a bit of a hot topic in the early 90s and I ran with it (i.e. why not compute and readout with transients rather than attractors).
Does stability matter in biology? My article on the cover of this month’s @PLOSCompBiol explores how large ecosystems develop supertransients, a manifestation of computational hardness (1/N)
doi.org/10.1371/jour...
doi.org/10.1371/jour...
June 16, 2025 at 9:15 PM
Transients! We love to see it. I think I need to look for a review covering recent work on transients in high dimensional nonlinear dynamical systems. It was a bit of a hot topic in the early 90s and I ran with it (i.e. why not compute and readout with transients rather than attractors).
@wang.social was it neural tangent kernels that you mentioned to me after the talk today? If so was there some specific new paper or development?
June 13, 2025 at 10:58 PM
@wang.social was it neural tangent kernels that you mentioned to me after the talk today? If so was there some specific new paper or development?
Reposted by ddemaris.bsky.social
"More singing" is almost always part of the solution, regardless of the problem. I love this woman for that observation.
"More singing would be better" is also just objectively true, for so many reasons both physiological and spiritual. It's unifying
April 6, 2025 at 12:13 AM
"More singing" is almost always part of the solution, regardless of the problem. I love this woman for that observation.
More of this please. It was something of a footnote in my dissertation work but with a neural field approach to categorization and invariance, there would inevitably arise "stuck on" sites that would be interpreted as Jennifer Aniston cells if you liked that sort of thing.
"The inevitability and superfluousness of cell types in spatial cognition" w Ken Luo @robmok.bsky.social Whether place, border, head direction, Jennifer Aniston, or whatever cells, are we fooling ourselves? Are these intuitive findings scientific discoveries? 1/6 www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
The inevitability and superfluousness of cell types in spatial cognition
bioRxiv - the preprint server for biology, operated by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, a research and educational institution
www.biorxiv.org
January 20, 2024 at 4:55 AM
More of this please. It was something of a footnote in my dissertation work but with a neural field approach to categorization and invariance, there would inevitably arise "stuck on" sites that would be interpreted as Jennifer Aniston cells if you liked that sort of thing.
Looking forward to diving in.
New paper! A universal pattern of brain wave frequencies. They are slower in deep cortical layers and faster in superficial layers. When something is this ubiquitous, you know it is doing something important.
picower.mit.edu/news/study-r...
picower.mit.edu/news/study-r...
January 20, 2024 at 4:47 AM
Looking forward to diving in.