Dr Theodosios Chatzistergos
@damagedonegr.bsky.social
Researcher at Max Planck institute for solar system research.
Studying solar activity and variability.
I am not on x (twitter), my account there is deleted.
https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=8gnK6BsAAAAJ&hl=en
Studying solar activity and variability.
I am not on x (twitter), my account there is deleted.
https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=8gnK6BsAAAAJ&hl=en
Willie Soon is indeed aware of these artefacts. Yet in the 1.5 year since I published this he has exploited and misled with the Hoyt and Schatten 1993 model numerous times, always hiding the objective methodological flaws of this model. Well, in his last video he even hides that it is a model!
June 26, 2025 at 12:57 PM
Willie Soon is indeed aware of these artefacts. Yet in the 1.5 year since I published this he has exploited and misled with the Hoyt and Schatten 1993 model numerous times, always hiding the objective methodological flaws of this model. Well, in his last video he even hides that it is a model!
Willie Soon's latest video is a textbook case of climate-change propaganda.
This short clip shows him making outrageously misleading claims about the Sun.
🧵🧪 #climatechange
This short clip shows him making outrageously misleading claims about the Sun.
🧵🧪 #climatechange
June 26, 2025 at 12:57 PM
Willie Soon's latest video is a textbook case of climate-change propaganda.
This short clip shows him making outrageously misleading claims about the Sun.
🧵🧪 #climatechange
This short clip shows him making outrageously misleading claims about the Sun.
🧵🧪 #climatechange
In our email exchanges, Hoyt avoided answering how he extended the smoothed sunspot number over the 10 years after the publication date of their paper (since they shifted it back by 10 years). What still seems curious to me is how closely their extension resembles another index they had used.
May 5, 2025 at 2:24 PM
In our email exchanges, Hoyt avoided answering how he extended the smoothed sunspot number over the 10 years after the publication date of their paper (since they shifted it back by 10 years). What still seems curious to me is how closely their extension resembles another index they had used.