Dr Theodosios Chatzistergos
@damagedonegr.bsky.social
Researcher at Max Planck institute for solar system research.
Studying solar activity and variability.
I am not on x (twitter), my account there is deleted.
https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=8gnK6BsAAAAJ&hl=en
Studying solar activity and variability.
I am not on x (twitter), my account there is deleted.
https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=8gnK6BsAAAAJ&hl=en
Congratulations!!
October 18, 2025 at 6:16 AM
Congratulations!!
I don't think I have anything better than these threads. Otherwise the paper mentioned in this thread would be my suggestion.
Zharkova has made a number of nonsense claims, was it her failed prediction for a grand solar minimum, her miscalculation of Sun-Earth distance change, or something else?
Zharkova has made a number of nonsense claims, was it her failed prediction for a grand solar minimum, her miscalculation of Sun-Earth distance change, or something else?
September 2, 2025 at 12:56 PM
I don't think I have anything better than these threads. Otherwise the paper mentioned in this thread would be my suggestion.
Zharkova has made a number of nonsense claims, was it her failed prediction for a grand solar minimum, her miscalculation of Sun-Earth distance change, or something else?
Zharkova has made a number of nonsense claims, was it her failed prediction for a grand solar minimum, her miscalculation of Sun-Earth distance change, or something else?
Reposted by Dr Theodosios Chatzistergos
And here's a video of the flare!
August 15, 2025 at 10:27 AM
And here's a video of the flare!
I guess you can include us, too. Although the sentence in which they cite us is factually accurate in isolation, the surrounding text creates a misleading impression. More importantly, our review paper, which they cited, explains why their subsequent paragraph has misleading & wrong statements.
July 30, 2025 at 9:58 PM
I guess you can include us, too. Although the sentence in which they cite us is factually accurate in isolation, the surrounding text creates a misleading impression. More importantly, our review paper, which they cited, explains why their subsequent paragraph has misleading & wrong statements.
BTW the list at the end would now include also Grok+2025, Green & Soon 2025, Soon+2024, Connolly+2023,2024, Scafetta 2025 and some older ones by Soon+1996, 2005, 2013, 2015, 2019, 2021 & Scafetta 2013, 2019.
As well as "climate the movie" and "the great global warming swindle" disinformation videos.
As well as "climate the movie" and "the great global warming swindle" disinformation videos.
July 30, 2025 at 7:38 AM
BTW the list at the end would now include also Grok+2025, Green & Soon 2025, Soon+2024, Connolly+2023,2024, Scafetta 2025 and some older ones by Soon+1996, 2005, 2013, 2015, 2019, 2021 & Scafetta 2013, 2019.
As well as "climate the movie" and "the great global warming swindle" disinformation videos.
As well as "climate the movie" and "the great global warming swindle" disinformation videos.
The method by Velasco Herrera, Willie Soon, et al., 2024 stood out as particularly problematic due to serious methodological flaws.
In particular, for implicitly assuming a constant standard deviation in sunspot number, which in reality varies significantly over time.
In particular, for implicitly assuming a constant standard deviation in sunspot number, which in reality varies significantly over time.
July 7, 2025 at 6:14 AM
The method by Velasco Herrera, Willie Soon, et al., 2024 stood out as particularly problematic due to serious methodological flaws.
In particular, for implicitly assuming a constant standard deviation in sunspot number, which in reality varies significantly over time.
In particular, for implicitly assuming a constant standard deviation in sunspot number, which in reality varies significantly over time.