Coffee Indiana
@coffeeindiana.bsky.social
Brady with the Bucs and Rodgers with the Packers would fit in that time frame. They mention Super Bowl LVII but don't show any footage from it, so I would guess sometime in 2022.
November 14, 2025 at 10:22 PM
Brady with the Bucs and Rodgers with the Packers would fit in that time frame. They mention Super Bowl LVII but don't show any footage from it, so I would guess sometime in 2022.
It appears he may be playing other NFL players who are also quite bad at chess, which makes it even better 😆
www.reddit.com/r/Chesscom/c...
www.reddit.com/r/Chesscom/c...
From the Chesscom community on Reddit: Chicago Bears Chess.com Players
Explore this post and more from the Chesscom community
www.reddit.com
November 13, 2025 at 8:49 PM
It appears he may be playing other NFL players who are also quite bad at chess, which makes it even better 😆
www.reddit.com/r/Chesscom/c...
www.reddit.com/r/Chesscom/c...
Oh yeah, you're definitely concerned with rudeness
a woman in a red shirt is making a funny face and saying `` sure , jan '' .
Alt: a woman in a red shirt is making a funny face and saying `` sure , jan '' .
media.tenor.com
November 10, 2025 at 8:59 PM
Oh yeah, you're definitely concerned with rudeness
Guess you're not good at positing questions then if you can't figure out what those two things represent.
November 10, 2025 at 8:53 PM
Guess you're not good at positing questions then if you can't figure out what those two things represent.
For one, AOC is primarily funded by small contributions and hardly any PAC money while Schumer is the complete opposite.
November 10, 2025 at 8:52 PM
For one, AOC is primarily funded by small contributions and hardly any PAC money while Schumer is the complete opposite.
"What do you expect him to do, *criticize* them?"
What a joke of an argument.
What a joke of an argument.
November 10, 2025 at 6:05 PM
"What do you expect him to do, *criticize* them?"
What a joke of an argument.
What a joke of an argument.
This would be a completion on most plays
November 10, 2025 at 5:00 PM
This would be a completion on most plays
You: "If you have shitty employees you shouldn't bother asking them to do better or even bother trying to hire better ones later, just accept it"
Overall: lead, follow or get the hell out of the way and it seems like you fall into that last bucket
Overall: lead, follow or get the hell out of the way and it seems like you fall into that last bucket
November 10, 2025 at 4:42 PM
You: "If you have shitty employees you shouldn't bother asking them to do better or even bother trying to hire better ones later, just accept it"
Overall: lead, follow or get the hell out of the way and it seems like you fall into that last bucket
Overall: lead, follow or get the hell out of the way and it seems like you fall into that last bucket
Also LOL at you thinking Democrats can't be bullied - they were bullied into pushing Biden out as a candidate with only months left to campaign.
November 10, 2025 at 4:29 PM
Also LOL at you thinking Democrats can't be bullied - they were bullied into pushing Biden out as a candidate with only months left to campaign.
Again, that's what Republicans have already done.
So if you think it won't work, you're going to have to point out a time when that approach has *failed* because it's already succeeded for one party.
So if you think it won't work, you're going to have to point out a time when that approach has *failed* because it's already succeeded for one party.
November 10, 2025 at 4:28 PM
Again, that's what Republicans have already done.
So if you think it won't work, you're going to have to point out a time when that approach has *failed* because it's already succeeded for one party.
So if you think it won't work, you're going to have to point out a time when that approach has *failed* because it's already succeeded for one party.
If existing Democrat senators don't eject this guy from leadership, it turns out they're all complicit and they should all go.
November 10, 2025 at 4:17 PM
If existing Democrat senators don't eject this guy from leadership, it turns out they're all complicit and they should all go.
The Republican party votes as a monolith and Democrats are out here saying it's not possible. If no current leader exists, all the more reason to boot them all until one surfaces that can get the job done. It's indefensible to shrug and just accept the mediocrity.
November 10, 2025 at 4:15 PM
The Republican party votes as a monolith and Democrats are out here saying it's not possible. If no current leader exists, all the more reason to boot them all until one surfaces that can get the job done. It's indefensible to shrug and just accept the mediocrity.
So Schumer is too weak to keep his party in line? Sounds like he should go.
OR they consciously decided to let the defectors (none of whom are up for election) vote this way, which sounds like he should go.
End result is the same, get his ass out of there.
OR they consciously decided to let the defectors (none of whom are up for election) vote this way, which sounds like he should go.
End result is the same, get his ass out of there.
November 10, 2025 at 3:57 PM
So Schumer is too weak to keep his party in line? Sounds like he should go.
OR they consciously decided to let the defectors (none of whom are up for election) vote this way, which sounds like he should go.
End result is the same, get his ass out of there.
OR they consciously decided to let the defectors (none of whom are up for election) vote this way, which sounds like he should go.
End result is the same, get his ass out of there.
Actually gotten the thing (ACA extension) that they were fighting for? Schumer has gotten a pinky promise they'll talk about it.
November 10, 2025 at 3:52 PM
Actually gotten the thing (ACA extension) that they were fighting for? Schumer has gotten a pinky promise they'll talk about it.
Paying $30 less per month in exchange for almost $20k less down in principle over 5 years is taking advantage of people.
I'm sure you don't think 30% interest credit cards aren't taking advantage of people.
Spend some time studying the 2008 financial crisis and the aftermath that still affects us
I'm sure you don't think 30% interest credit cards aren't taking advantage of people.
Spend some time studying the 2008 financial crisis and the aftermath that still affects us
November 9, 2025 at 3:31 PM
Paying $30 less per month in exchange for almost $20k less down in principle over 5 years is taking advantage of people.
I'm sure you don't think 30% interest credit cards aren't taking advantage of people.
Spend some time studying the 2008 financial crisis and the aftermath that still affects us
I'm sure you don't think 30% interest credit cards aren't taking advantage of people.
Spend some time studying the 2008 financial crisis and the aftermath that still affects us
"I don't understand why people with limited funds shouldn't be taken advantage of" - ok man.
Rich people and businesses can already secure non standard loans for tax purposes. We have a consumer financial protection bureau for a reason and they don't recommend anything past 30.
Rich people and businesses can already secure non standard loans for tax purposes. We have a consumer financial protection bureau for a reason and they don't recommend anything past 30.
November 9, 2025 at 2:52 PM
"I don't understand why people with limited funds shouldn't be taken advantage of" - ok man.
Rich people and businesses can already secure non standard loans for tax purposes. We have a consumer financial protection bureau for a reason and they don't recommend anything past 30.
Rich people and businesses can already secure non standard loans for tax purposes. We have a consumer financial protection bureau for a reason and they don't recommend anything past 30.
A $300k home for 50 years at 7% has you paying around $2700 towards principle in the first 5 years.
For 30 years at 6.22% you would have paid off around $22k towards principle.
For 30 years at 6.22% you would have paid off around $22k towards principle.
November 9, 2025 at 4:37 AM
A $300k home for 50 years at 7% has you paying around $2700 towards principle in the first 5 years.
For 30 years at 6.22% you would have paid off around $22k towards principle.
For 30 years at 6.22% you would have paid off around $22k towards principle.
That's even worse, as early payments are heavily interest loaded. So people won't accrue equity/pay down principle. You'd be way better off renting in that situation once you factor in closing costs as well.
November 9, 2025 at 4:29 AM
That's even worse, as early payments are heavily interest loaded. So people won't accrue equity/pay down principle. You'd be way better off renting in that situation once you factor in closing costs as well.
15 yr rate is currently 5.5% and 30yr is 6.22%. So I'd assume a 50 yr will be more like 7%.
A $300k home for 30 yrs at 6.22% is a monthly payment of $1473. Total interest paid is $290k.
For 50 yrs at 7% it's $1444. Total interest paid is $626k.
A $300k home for 30 yrs at 6.22% is a monthly payment of $1473. Total interest paid is $290k.
For 50 yrs at 7% it's $1444. Total interest paid is $626k.
November 9, 2025 at 3:27 AM
15 yr rate is currently 5.5% and 30yr is 6.22%. So I'd assume a 50 yr will be more like 7%.
A $300k home for 30 yrs at 6.22% is a monthly payment of $1473. Total interest paid is $290k.
For 50 yrs at 7% it's $1444. Total interest paid is $626k.
A $300k home for 30 yrs at 6.22% is a monthly payment of $1473. Total interest paid is $290k.
For 50 yrs at 7% it's $1444. Total interest paid is $626k.
Rocket Mortgage has a page on 40 yr loans and it's just crazy.
Their hypo is a $1.1 million loan for 30 vs 40 yrs at the same 6.5% interest rate. The 40 yr will save you $500/month but the up costing $588k more over in interest 😱
www.rocketmortgage.com/learn/40-yea...
Their hypo is a $1.1 million loan for 30 vs 40 yrs at the same 6.5% interest rate. The 40 yr will save you $500/month but the up costing $588k more over in interest 😱
www.rocketmortgage.com/learn/40-yea...
40-year mortgage: An explanation, the pros and cons
A 40-year loan term can bring down your monthly payment in exchange for paying more overall interest and some riskier features. Learn more about 40-year loans.
www.rocketmortgage.com
November 8, 2025 at 10:10 PM
Rocket Mortgage has a page on 40 yr loans and it's just crazy.
Their hypo is a $1.1 million loan for 30 vs 40 yrs at the same 6.5% interest rate. The 40 yr will save you $500/month but the up costing $588k more over in interest 😱
www.rocketmortgage.com/learn/40-yea...
Their hypo is a $1.1 million loan for 30 vs 40 yrs at the same 6.5% interest rate. The 40 yr will save you $500/month but the up costing $588k more over in interest 😱
www.rocketmortgage.com/learn/40-yea...
It's kind of like the jumbo ARMs though - when the people taking the mortgages are the ones financially who shouldn't take the mortgages, it's a bad idea. We wouldn't want 10 year auto loans for the same reason (though cars depreciate faster).
November 8, 2025 at 9:57 PM
It's kind of like the jumbo ARMs though - when the people taking the mortgages are the ones financially who shouldn't take the mortgages, it's a bad idea. We wouldn't want 10 year auto loans for the same reason (though cars depreciate faster).