He is not a victim, he is one of 650MPs all of whom are equal and have to 'share the mic'.
Perhaps he should reflect on why there is so much to attack him on
He is not a victim, he is one of 650MPs all of whom are equal and have to 'share the mic'.
Perhaps he should reflect on why there is so much to attack him on
He is not a victim, he is one of 650MPs all of whom are equal and have to 'share the mic'.
Perhaps he should reflect on why there is so much to attack him on.
He is not a victim, he is one of 650MPs all of whom are equal and have to 'share the mic'.
Perhaps he should reflect on why there is so much to attack him on.
Who took all these civil servants on in the first place?
What caused the spike in 2016?
These questions are bound to be asked. The answers may be a bit awkward.
Who took all these civil servants on in the first place?
What caused the spike in 2016?
These questions are bound to be asked. The answers may be a bit awkward.
1, establish the benefit/need for digital ID.
2, identify the risk/costs.
3. Establish mitigations to address the risks.
4, consider if the need/benefits outweigh the mitigated costs/risks.
Digital ID is now a government commitment whist still on step 1.
1, establish the benefit/need for digital ID.
2, identify the risk/costs.
3. Establish mitigations to address the risks.
4, consider if the need/benefits outweigh the mitigated costs/risks.
Digital ID is now a government commitment whist still on step 1.
What is the benefitting of digital ID?
What are the costs/risks?
Do the benefits outweigh the costs?
Should this be a priority for tax payer funds?
I've not heard a specific benefit yet.
What is the benefitting of digital ID?
What are the costs/risks?
Do the benefits outweigh the costs?
Should this be a priority for tax payer funds?
I've not heard a specific benefit yet.