Kevin Russell Cook
@citizencook.bsky.social
Politics, world events, culture, and, every once in a while, something gratuitously silly. Good discussions wanted. NOT looking for online pals. Lastly, I Will NOT chat (DM, or PM), unless I otherwise know you.
If I did that, If I did that and sincerely petitioned them,
the net effect would be nothing. I share your sentiment, not your strategy.
the net effect would be nothing. I share your sentiment, not your strategy.
December 9, 2025 at 2:11 AM
If I did that, If I did that and sincerely petitioned them,
the net effect would be nothing. I share your sentiment, not your strategy.
the net effect would be nothing. I share your sentiment, not your strategy.
I'm all for peaceful. But, could we really expect more than we can expect from NO KINGS? (Maybe. It wouldn't hurt.)
Formal declarations by existing organization involving public ceremonies. This needs to have the replicating element that chain letters have. Don't suffer these fools. Correct them.
Formal declarations by existing organization involving public ceremonies. This needs to have the replicating element that chain letters have. Don't suffer these fools. Correct them.
December 8, 2025 at 6:59 PM
I'm all for peaceful. But, could we really expect more than we can expect from NO KINGS? (Maybe. It wouldn't hurt.)
Formal declarations by existing organization involving public ceremonies. This needs to have the replicating element that chain letters have. Don't suffer these fools. Correct them.
Formal declarations by existing organization involving public ceremonies. This needs to have the replicating element that chain letters have. Don't suffer these fools. Correct them.
Call them ceremonies, if you will, but NGO's need to be shaming the court, stripping it, bit by bit, of popular legitimacy by means of "peoples impeachment" proceedings. Dozens, hundreds, thousands, in every village and city, over and over.
December 8, 2025 at 6:15 PM
Call them ceremonies, if you will, but NGO's need to be shaming the court, stripping it, bit by bit, of popular legitimacy by means of "peoples impeachment" proceedings. Dozens, hundreds, thousands, in every village and city, over and over.
These are our choices:
1) We can ask Congress to do what they are expressly not at all inclined to do, OR
2) We can do it ourselves.
Public action should NOT be self-limited to petitioning a recalcitrant Congress. We must, emphatically,
strip the imperious justices of our respect.
1) We can ask Congress to do what they are expressly not at all inclined to do, OR
2) We can do it ourselves.
Public action should NOT be self-limited to petitioning a recalcitrant Congress. We must, emphatically,
strip the imperious justices of our respect.
December 6, 2025 at 10:59 PM
These are our choices:
1) We can ask Congress to do what they are expressly not at all inclined to do, OR
2) We can do it ourselves.
Public action should NOT be self-limited to petitioning a recalcitrant Congress. We must, emphatically,
strip the imperious justices of our respect.
1) We can ask Congress to do what they are expressly not at all inclined to do, OR
2) We can do it ourselves.
Public action should NOT be self-limited to petitioning a recalcitrant Congress. We must, emphatically,
strip the imperious justices of our respect.
In response to their outlaw rulings (i.e., gratuitous presidential immunity) We need a clearly expressed mass opposition and rejection of the unconstitutional rulings of this SCOTUS. In response to their shadow docket, and enumerated rulings, let's bring them back within the reach of the people.
December 6, 2025 at 10:50 PM
In response to their outlaw rulings (i.e., gratuitous presidential immunity) We need a clearly expressed mass opposition and rejection of the unconstitutional rulings of this SCOTUS. In response to their shadow docket, and enumerated rulings, let's bring them back within the reach of the people.
A multitude of Citizens groups, each separately, should declare the SCOTUS derelict, therefore lacking legitimacy, and "impeached" in the eyes of the citizenry of this republic.
By declaration of the people, we must deprive them of legitimacy. An extra-legal move, aiming for thorough embarrassment.
By declaration of the people, we must deprive them of legitimacy. An extra-legal move, aiming for thorough embarrassment.
December 6, 2025 at 10:44 PM
A multitude of Citizens groups, each separately, should declare the SCOTUS derelict, therefore lacking legitimacy, and "impeached" in the eyes of the citizenry of this republic.
By declaration of the people, we must deprive them of legitimacy. An extra-legal move, aiming for thorough embarrassment.
By declaration of the people, we must deprive them of legitimacy. An extra-legal move, aiming for thorough embarrassment.
They should be publically denounced in all corners of the republic and declared derelict in their duty to the constitution.
Defund them? NO. De-legitimatize them.
Defund them? NO. De-legitimatize them.
December 6, 2025 at 6:05 PM
They should be publically denounced in all corners of the republic and declared derelict in their duty to the constitution.
Defund them? NO. De-legitimatize them.
Defund them? NO. De-legitimatize them.
Reposted by Kevin Russell Cook
No war here; so, no war crime.
It's simply murder,
a capital crime, all within a matrix of other crimes, and
all within a military context.
It's simply murder,
a capital crime, all within a matrix of other crimes, and
all within a military context.
December 3, 2025 at 4:08 AM
No war here; so, no war crime.
It's simply murder,
a capital crime, all within a matrix of other crimes, and
all within a military context.
It's simply murder,
a capital crime, all within a matrix of other crimes, and
all within a military context.
Your meme is not rational argument. I assumed it might be possible to have an objective dialogue here.
I was wrong in that assumption.
I was wrong in that assumption.
December 6, 2025 at 5:51 PM
Your meme is not rational argument. I assumed it might be possible to have an objective dialogue here.
I was wrong in that assumption.
I was wrong in that assumption.
You really don't see the differences? Deporting citizens and legal green card holders to 3rd world countries with which they have no history. Defying court orders. The sheer magnitude and brutality of the effort done under the pretense of "the worst of the worst".
December 6, 2025 at 5:48 PM
You really don't see the differences? Deporting citizens and legal green card holders to 3rd world countries with which they have no history. Defying court orders. The sheer magnitude and brutality of the effort done under the pretense of "the worst of the worst".
We ought to be holding people's impeachments and removals from office in every town square of every village and city in the United States.
The court is derelict in its duty to the country and the constitution. We must challenge the basis of their authority.
The court is derelict in its duty to the country and the constitution. We must challenge the basis of their authority.
December 6, 2025 at 6:34 AM
We ought to be holding people's impeachments and removals from office in every town square of every village and city in the United States.
The court is derelict in its duty to the country and the constitution. We must challenge the basis of their authority.
The court is derelict in its duty to the country and the constitution. We must challenge the basis of their authority.