Christian Grose
@christiangrose.bsky.social
Author; Editor; Teacher; Professor of Political Science & Public Policy; Academic Director. USC DukeU UofR. Opinions my own. Links and retweets are not endorsements.
Reposted by Christian Grose
On Spotify: #ElectionScienceOfficeHours w/ @rmichaelalvarez.bsky.social & @christiangrose.bsky.social
@caltechlcssp.bsky.social @caltech.edu USC
open.spotify.com/episode/22V6...
@caltechlcssp.bsky.social @caltech.edu USC
open.spotify.com/episode/22V6...
Episode 26: Christian Grose, The Votes are In!
open.spotify.com
November 7, 2025 at 12:31 AM
Reposted by Christian Grose
On Spotify: #ElectionScienceOfficeHours w/ @rmichaelalvarez.bsky.social & @christiangrose.bsky.social
@caltechlcssp.bsky.social @caltech.edu USC
open.spotify.com/episode/22V6...
@caltechlcssp.bsky.social @caltech.edu USC
open.spotify.com/episode/22V6...
Episode 26: Christian Grose, The Votes are In!
open.spotify.com
November 7, 2025 at 12:31 AM
Full podcast and discussion is here: www.falter.at/podcasts/rad...
Podcast: Wie Trumps Krieg gegen die Unis die USA verändert
Die amerikanischen Universitäten sind zum Schlachtfeld der “Culture Wars” geworden – mit potentiell langfristigen Folgen für Wissenschaft und Forschung. – Folge #1475
www.falter.at
September 27, 2025 at 9:24 PM
Full podcast and discussion is here: www.falter.at/podcasts/rad...
Reposted by Christian Grose
Es diskutieren: Linda Feldmann (Washington DC, Christian Science Monitor), @christiangrose.bsky.social (Los Angeles, Schwarzenegger Institut) und @rheinisch.bsky.social (Universität Salzburg) im @kreiskyforum.bsky.social.
September 27, 2025 at 8:30 AM
Es diskutieren: Linda Feldmann (Washington DC, Christian Science Monitor), @christiangrose.bsky.social (Los Angeles, Schwarzenegger Institut) und @rheinisch.bsky.social (Universität Salzburg) im @kreiskyforum.bsky.social.
Technically Davis v. Bandemer (1986) said partisan gerrymandering was justiciable, and then Rucho (2019) strongly disagreed and overturned. But in practice, both cases affirmed and kept in place partisan gerrymandered maps.
August 25, 2025 at 6:33 PM
Technically Davis v. Bandemer (1986) said partisan gerrymandering was justiciable, and then Rucho (2019) strongly disagreed and overturned. But in practice, both cases affirmed and kept in place partisan gerrymandered maps.
The R gerrymander in 1980s Indiana worked as expected in the aggregate, but some R incumbents lost unexpectedly along the way to the gerrymander. In Davis v. Bandemer (1986), SCOTUS allowed partisan gerrymandering and it was affirmed again in Rucho (2019).
August 25, 2025 at 5:09 PM
The R gerrymander in 1980s Indiana worked as expected in the aggregate, but some R incumbents lost unexpectedly along the way to the gerrymander. In Davis v. Bandemer (1986), SCOTUS allowed partisan gerrymandering and it was affirmed again in Rucho (2019).