chrclarke.bsky.social
@chrclarke.bsky.social
The revisionist history is also a tell - the exact same articles were being written in the late 90s. That time it was the “baby boomers refusing to retire” that was preventing Gen X born in 1974 from getting established in careers
December 16, 2025 at 2:46 PM
Who knew that the skill of building a high quality high rise would translate so directly into building a team
December 13, 2025 at 1:38 AM
Since we're on the topic of dress, from a no shoes inside country I'm curious: do you wear any shoes in the house or specific? Depending on conditions I could wear dress shoes, sneakers, snow boots, rain boots, or hiking boots. I could see wearing dress shoes inside, but not any of the others.
November 24, 2025 at 11:24 PM
This seems to be the consensus
KBJ threaded the needle thanks to CA1’s unfinished business.

-if she denied the admin stay, the full SCOTUS woulda stepped in to override her.
-if she immediately referred the case to the full Court, they coulda dragged feet.
-instead she boxed them in to act quickly once she does refer the case.
November 8, 2025 at 4:14 AM
Vancouver - it means bring it up (like our government tables a bill). The American usage confused the heck out of me for years until I realized they have it backwards.
November 5, 2025 at 4:59 PM
<Cries in Canadian>
November 4, 2025 at 2:54 PM
Meanwhile I'm sitting here trying to figure out how you typed "fob't" thinking your hands are one column off the home keys then getting confused on how you got the o & t right
August 8, 2025 at 3:59 AM
Good boy is just trying to help! She must be tired running all over the place. He's got bigger legs and can get her there faster!
August 8, 2025 at 3:46 AM
As someone who is old enough that I'd probably take vows rather than try to figure the dating scene out, I find the competing narratives I see of "sex is too casual now" and "society is falling apart because young people don't have sex" interesting because they seem so inconsistent.
August 1, 2025 at 9:04 PM
This showed up right under the WSJ letter for me, and I had to read “Introduction to the grooming process” 3 times before I understood what it wasn’t about 😅
July 18, 2025 at 2:29 AM
It’s useful for something deployed at broadly. Even “I got vaccinated and got into a car accident” can seem silly but at a population level multiple reports can lead to identifying some people may get dizzy or blurry vision! “I got turned into the Hulk” can be filtered out or rejected on review.
July 1, 2025 at 11:27 PM
Absolutely - VAERS is a great resource for identifying effects that could get missed in clinical trials, because they are a 1 in a million or even 10 million. But once a potential signal a seen there’s further study to determine a correlation or causation.
July 1, 2025 at 11:22 PM
Should have been more explicit - tagging @bioprofbarker.bsky.social to connect with @philplait.bsky.social about the usefulness of VAERS
July 1, 2025 at 9:40 PM
Tagging @bioprofbarker.bsky.social to connect science communicators from different fields
July 1, 2025 at 9:07 PM
The question is - Should we get rid of a scientifically useful resource because it can be abused? The anti vaxxers are going to keep denying anyway.
July 1, 2025 at 9:03 PM
Disagree - It’s not useless (reference This Week in Virology podcast). VAERS is very useful - it allows statistical analysis to find signals that might not be expected or obvious. But “I got vaccinated last week and then for struck by lightning” reports, are unfortunately ripe for abuse
July 1, 2025 at 9:02 PM
Well it's hidden because you can't see it behind the traffic control necessary in the parking lot, right? And underrated because, umm, okay, I've not nothing here.
June 4, 2025 at 1:05 AM
I thought you were heading for "south Vancouver will be in the middle of the City of Vancouver" with this one
May 7, 2025 at 10:41 PM
Sure the travel photos were great, this is the content bluesky has been missing until now!
March 25, 2025 at 5:40 PM
As a reminder - Canadas anger any boycotts are not about tariffs. They are about this and the threats of military invasion.
March 19, 2025 at 2:26 AM
US News seems to be going to a lot of effort to avoid saying anything about constant threats to destroy other countries too. Oddly “your country should not exist and we plan to destroy it” seems to have a significant impact on tourism choices. Even more than a tariff.
March 16, 2025 at 5:24 PM