Any regulatory value can become a trap if you have a Robbie Gibb on your board. "Due impartiality", as interpreted by umpteen versions of the Editorial guidelines, much better than "objective" or "pluralist" cadmus.eui.eu/entities/pub...

Well, they could both be right!

Is this a reaction to a particular piece of news or decision?

Yeah, it's fun but some of the claims are a bit 🧐

Yeah, I might write to them asking for a correction

I think there is an optional "global competences" stand, but the numbers there don't at all match the claim

No, I think this is Oz cringe towards other anglophone polities

Really not sure what OECD tests this refers to though

Nothing that bad so far...

I'm not sure I can keep coming back with quips - it's like my battery is completely drained

Oh, you don't? Really? Bit of a volt-face that, given what you said before...

I have a dream where someone introduces SNTV by accident by making people only mark one cross in multimenber wards

I guess if we had fixed terms at national level we could fix them at some point through the term and then it would even out across time as different parties are penalized. Given that we don't, happy to adopt your semi-unserious suggestion!

Impressions: contactless payments on public transport=a major improvement; tram to airport just works. But now almost impossible to buy a print newspaper @ an edicola; they've all disappeared & the product market regulation which prevented supermarkets from selling passports means there is a vacuum

Bet you were really amped up after you thought of that...

That's a good point