Hannah 🌹🏳️🌈
@ceremonialgeek.substack.com
Collects Records
Loves Music
Tech Enthusiast
Labour Member
Pragmatist
I like a debate built on evidence, not vibes.
Number one fan of the suits worn by the Chancellor of the Exchequer
Loves Music
Tech Enthusiast
Labour Member
Pragmatist
I like a debate built on evidence, not vibes.
Number one fan of the suits worn by the Chancellor of the Exchequer
Has Rowling said anything about Trump being mentioned more times in the files than Harry Potter himself across seven of her books?
February 9, 2026 at 11:24 AM
Has Rowling said anything about Trump being mentioned more times in the files than Harry Potter himself across seven of her books?
You see, this is my biggest concern with a leadership change: it triggers a Truss, and if the CX is replaced in cabinet, the economy tanks.
February 9, 2026 at 9:57 AM
You see, this is my biggest concern with a leadership change: it triggers a Truss, and if the CX is replaced in cabinet, the economy tanks.
Let's rephrase the headline:
Seventy per cent of Britons are unsure or don't know whether Burnham would be a better PM than Starmer.
Seventy per cent of Britons are unsure or don't know whether Burnham would be a better PM than Starmer.
January 29, 2026 at 11:59 AM
Let's rephrase the headline:
Seventy per cent of Britons are unsure or don't know whether Burnham would be a better PM than Starmer.
Seventy per cent of Britons are unsure or don't know whether Burnham would be a better PM than Starmer.
Seen quite a few people pearl clutching over Starmer's, Macron joke. For those of you that don't know, this was Macron's reaction:
January 27, 2026 at 6:13 PM
Seen quite a few people pearl clutching over Starmer's, Macron joke. For those of you that don't know, this was Macron's reaction:
Lighten up, Macron joined in.
January 27, 2026 at 6:10 PM
Lighten up, Macron joined in.
The damage was done the second that Burnham decided to put his name forward. Behaviour like this, is why I have always been skeptical of his return to Parliament. Losing a by-election is bad, but Burnham running opens up the possibility of losing two of them. Which is worse? You do the Maths.
January 25, 2026 at 10:33 PM
The damage was done the second that Burnham decided to put his name forward. Behaviour like this, is why I have always been skeptical of his return to Parliament. Losing a by-election is bad, but Burnham running opens up the possibility of losing two of them. Which is worse? You do the Maths.
Rachel Reeves W. Oh, to be a fly on the wall.
January 22, 2026 at 9:24 PM
Rachel Reeves W. Oh, to be a fly on the wall.
This is quite possibly the worst argument for age restrictions on social media, I have ever seen.
January 21, 2026 at 10:40 PM
This is quite possibly the worst argument for age restrictions on social media, I have ever seen.
Posting this without comment.
January 21, 2026 at 2:53 PM
Posting this without comment.
See also, attacking Stella Creasy of all people:
January 20, 2026 at 2:28 PM
See also, attacking Stella Creasy of all people:
Nasty behaviour from Zack Polanski. Going after Stella Creasy speaks volumes of his character. Stella cares deeply about the people of Walthamstow and is an exemplary back bencher. If Zack goes up against her in the next GE, I hope he loses big time.
January 20, 2026 at 11:59 AM
Nasty behaviour from Zack Polanski. Going after Stella Creasy speaks volumes of his character. Stella cares deeply about the people of Walthamstow and is an exemplary back bencher. If Zack goes up against her in the next GE, I hope he loses big time.
Well, well, well.
January 19, 2026 at 9:43 PM
Well, well, well.
I suspect a lot of people are thinking this right now...
January 17, 2026 at 10:13 PM
I suspect a lot of people are thinking this right now...
I have to hand it to Badenoch here, this is a mature and level headed response. Credit where credit is due.
January 17, 2026 at 5:43 PM
I have to hand it to Badenoch here, this is a mature and level headed response. Credit where credit is due.
Chat, is this real?
January 16, 2026 at 9:21 AM
Chat, is this real?
Thoughts and prayers with Chris Mason at this difficult time.
January 15, 2026 at 7:39 AM
Thoughts and prayers with Chris Mason at this difficult time.
What is the author's point here? I've never seen someone say such a load of nothing in quite so many words. To quote, David Byrne: "You're talking a lot, but you're not saying anything".
January 13, 2026 at 9:49 PM
What is the author's point here? I've never seen someone say such a load of nothing in quite so many words. To quote, David Byrne: "You're talking a lot, but you're not saying anything".
1) Banning children from social media does not stop adults from creating non-consensual sexual content of other women or indeed children.
2) Banning children from viewing said content, does not make said content, ethical or legal.
3) It is remarkable how badly Kemi Badenoch misses the point.
2) Banning children from viewing said content, does not make said content, ethical or legal.
3) It is remarkable how badly Kemi Badenoch misses the point.
January 12, 2026 at 7:06 PM
1) Banning children from social media does not stop adults from creating non-consensual sexual content of other women or indeed children.
2) Banning children from viewing said content, does not make said content, ethical or legal.
3) It is remarkable how badly Kemi Badenoch misses the point.
2) Banning children from viewing said content, does not make said content, ethical or legal.
3) It is remarkable how badly Kemi Badenoch misses the point.
I'll believe it when I see it.
January 11, 2026 at 9:35 AM
I'll believe it when I see it.
Even by the Daily Mail's standards, this is low.
January 8, 2026 at 10:24 PM
Even by the Daily Mail's standards, this is low.
