Maybe, and I know this is a crazy idea but stick with me, if you take money away from people who have a a lot of it, you could give it to the people who don't have much. We could call it taxation.
December 3, 2025 at 9:03 AM
Maybe, and I know this is a crazy idea but stick with me, if you take money away from people who have a a lot of it, you could give it to the people who don't have much. We could call it taxation.
There are important issues about a lawyer’s role in a time of democratic erosion that law schools, and perhaps leading law schools especially, need to address. But unless you can point to a causal link between a specific legal education and an action 15 years later, maybe give the hyperbole a rest
October 18, 2025 at 4:27 PM
There are important issues about a lawyer’s role in a time of democratic erosion that law schools, and perhaps leading law schools especially, need to address. But unless you can point to a causal link between a specific legal education and an action 15 years later, maybe give the hyperbole a rest
Extraordinarily corrupt. I watched FCC chair Brendan Carr's full interview on Hannity. Carr basically said straight out that coverage of Trump he deems overly hostile can be decreed contrary to the "public interest," and thus grounds for yanking licenses:
Extraordinarily corrupt. I watched FCC chair Brendan Carr's full interview on Hannity. Carr basically said straight out that coverage of Trump he deems overly hostile can be decreed contrary to the "public interest," and thus grounds for yanking licenses: