@justsecurity.org
"[Admiral] Bradley ... affirmed having sought real-time legal advice, but that he did not say whether his military lawyer considered the survivors shipwrecked and out of the fight."
@justsecurity.org
(Also: Trump covered up the Epstein files, listen to Republican women in Congress when they say this administration doesn’t respect women)”
Such a mystery what he means when he says this stuff, isn’t it?
The more we learn, the harder it is to deny it was a war crime.
📌 The Atlantic: Footage was so graphic it made viewers nauseated. “Worse than we were led to believe.”
📌 NBC News: Pete Hegseth ordered the military to kill all 11 people on the boat.
1/2
The more we learn, the harder it is to deny it was a war crime.
📌 The Atlantic: Footage was so graphic it made viewers nauseated. “Worse than we were led to believe.”
📌 NBC News: Pete Hegseth ordered the military to kill all 11 people on the boat.
1/2
TOM COTTON: Well I saw lots of evidence of them standing on the boat that had been capsized
BERMAN: That wasn't my question. Did you see any evidence?
COTTON: No, I didn't
TOM COTTON: Well I saw lots of evidence of them standing on the boat that had been capsized
BERMAN: That wasn't my question. Did you see any evidence?
COTTON: No, I didn't
Our kids are watching.
Our kids are watching.
He will choose restoration over reform because he has been groomed by the Establishment.
I wish people could finally accept this.
He will choose restoration over reform because he has been groomed by the Establishment.
I wish people could finally accept this.
Pete Hegseth seems to be a war criminal. Without a war. An interesting achievement."
-George Will
Pete Hegseth seems to be a war criminal. Without a war. An interesting achievement."
-George Will
The White House simply does not deny the follow up strike was to allow no survivors.
And the 'law' Leavitt cites is utterly irrelevant (self-defense is a non-sequitur, it's not armed conflict, and 'no survivors' is a crime).
LEAVITT: The strike was conducted in self defense to protect Americans
The White House simply does not deny the follow up strike was to allow no survivors.
And the 'law' Leavitt cites is utterly irrelevant (self-defense is a non-sequitur, it's not armed conflict, and 'no survivors' is a crime).