"Is that a real paper? That seems like 'boy bat' on there." --my partner, just now
November 22, 2025 at 8:29 PM
"Is that a real paper? That seems like 'boy bat' on there." --my partner, just now
Amazing.
Also, looking at the shortcuts on the left... Is it weird that he had no direct correspondence with Trump?
Also, looking at the shortcuts on the left... Is it weird that he had no direct correspondence with Trump?
November 21, 2025 at 11:59 PM
Amazing.
Also, looking at the shortcuts on the left... Is it weird that he had no direct correspondence with Trump?
Also, looking at the shortcuts on the left... Is it weird that he had no direct correspondence with Trump?
The idea that a swastika, of all things, would no longer be recognized as a hate symbol really took my breath away. Astonishing.
*Removing it* is maybe 100x worse. Not as if they're refusing to add the ironic OK gesture; they're removing a symbol universally recognized as hateful for 90 years.
*Removing it* is maybe 100x worse. Not as if they're refusing to add the ironic OK gesture; they're removing a symbol universally recognized as hateful for 90 years.
November 20, 2025 at 9:21 PM
The idea that a swastika, of all things, would no longer be recognized as a hate symbol really took my breath away. Astonishing.
*Removing it* is maybe 100x worse. Not as if they're refusing to add the ironic OK gesture; they're removing a symbol universally recognized as hateful for 90 years.
*Removing it* is maybe 100x worse. Not as if they're refusing to add the ironic OK gesture; they're removing a symbol universally recognized as hateful for 90 years.
You've doing that throwback media coverage on Patreon, so I thought this was an old trailer for one of the movies I hadn't seen (which is all of them). Realizing there was a "2026" in the title made me physically pull back.
November 20, 2025 at 7:37 PM
You've doing that throwback media coverage on Patreon, so I thought this was an old trailer for one of the movies I hadn't seen (which is all of them). Realizing there was a "2026" in the title made me physically pull back.
Mortifyingly proud
November 19, 2025 at 10:15 PM
Mortifyingly proud
Kind of losing my mind at the games that did get nominated.
November 18, 2025 at 6:07 AM
Kind of losing my mind at the games that did get nominated.
I don't want to defend anything Ring does, but in that instance wouldn't it be a matter of convenience instead of security? Being able to answer the door when you're not home, or on the toilet, or you're sick/disabled... Especially in a world of constant deliveries, I'd think security is secondary.
November 17, 2025 at 5:29 PM
I don't want to defend anything Ring does, but in that instance wouldn't it be a matter of convenience instead of security? Being able to answer the door when you're not home, or on the toilet, or you're sick/disabled... Especially in a world of constant deliveries, I'd think security is secondary.
Even in this perfect vision where the AI is somehow helpful is pretty fucked. Comparing it to private security only underscores how access to these devices is routinely provided to actual law enforcement without a warrant. Now: even more sophisticated! And with no oversight!
November 17, 2025 at 5:27 PM
Even in this perfect vision where the AI is somehow helpful is pretty fucked. Comparing it to private security only underscores how access to these devices is routinely provided to actual law enforcement without a warrant. Now: even more sophisticated! And with no oversight!
I feel the same way about Star Trek V. It's infamous, but upon a recent re-watch of all the Trek movies it's obviously made on the cheap but is otherwise honestly fine.
November 16, 2025 at 8:54 AM
I feel the same way about Star Trek V. It's infamous, but upon a recent re-watch of all the Trek movies it's obviously made on the cheap but is otherwise honestly fine.
Immediately reminds me of the "Project Gemstone" scene from White House Plumbers
November 16, 2025 at 3:09 AM
Immediately reminds me of the "Project Gemstone" scene from White House Plumbers
I know this isn't the point, but *why* does this segment have to be shot on a handheld camera with a fish-eye lens? Is there a risk that it will turn into a skateboard video from 2002?
November 13, 2025 at 9:01 PM
I know this isn't the point, but *why* does this segment have to be shot on a handheld camera with a fish-eye lens? Is there a risk that it will turn into a skateboard video from 2002?
Someone's definitely thinking about it, right? If Vance is sworn in after the midterms he'd (probably) be constitutionally eligible to run in 2028 and 2032.
November 13, 2025 at 4:04 PM
Someone's definitely thinking about it, right? If Vance is sworn in after the midterms he'd (probably) be constitutionally eligible to run in 2028 and 2032.
I wouldn't be surprised if he becomes the first President to adjourn congress.
November 13, 2025 at 6:56 AM
I wouldn't be surprised if he becomes the first President to adjourn congress.