@bluedot1547.bsky.social
Truth? Justice?
Where is the love?
Xscapee.
Where is the love?
Xscapee.
Reposted
The optics of Trump building a ballroom that 99.9% of Americans will never set foot in while millions line up for food banks are worth more than any policy paper or economic proposal. This image is a visceral punch in the mouth that needs no words. It should haunt the GOP for a generation.
a live look at the demolition of the White House's East Wing for Trump's ballroom
October 22, 2025 at 5:18 PM
The optics of Trump building a ballroom that 99.9% of Americans will never set foot in while millions line up for food banks are worth more than any policy paper or economic proposal. This image is a visceral punch in the mouth that needs no words. It should haunt the GOP for a generation.
Reposted
JD Vance can dismiss the Young Republicans as a college group chat.
But let's be clear: the group chat includes a State Senator, a Trump Admin official, and multiple Republican staffers — and some of the worst comments came from folks associated with Mike Johnson, Elise Stefanik, and Mike Lawler.
But let's be clear: the group chat includes a State Senator, a Trump Admin official, and multiple Republican staffers — and some of the worst comments came from folks associated with Mike Johnson, Elise Stefanik, and Mike Lawler.
October 15, 2025 at 2:45 AM
JD Vance can dismiss the Young Republicans as a college group chat.
But let's be clear: the group chat includes a State Senator, a Trump Admin official, and multiple Republican staffers — and some of the worst comments came from folks associated with Mike Johnson, Elise Stefanik, and Mike Lawler.
But let's be clear: the group chat includes a State Senator, a Trump Admin official, and multiple Republican staffers — and some of the worst comments came from folks associated with Mike Johnson, Elise Stefanik, and Mike Lawler.
Reposted
Chris Murphy: "Republicans are boycotting negotiations to reopen the govt bc they're desperate to raise premiums on people by 75% in order to finance their tax cut for the wealthy. The other reason House isn't in town? They're about to have enough votes to mandate the release of the Epstein files."
October 12, 2025 at 3:16 PM
Chris Murphy: "Republicans are boycotting negotiations to reopen the govt bc they're desperate to raise premiums on people by 75% in order to finance their tax cut for the wealthy. The other reason House isn't in town? They're about to have enough votes to mandate the release of the Epstein files."
Reposted
He finally got his revenge against the man who asked him if he was up past his jail time.
Now it's up to us to ask why he's terrified to release #TheEPSTEIN_PedoFiles.
#StandWithTheSurvivors
Now it's up to us to ask why he's terrified to release #TheEPSTEIN_PedoFiles.
#StandWithTheSurvivors
September 19, 2025 at 7:40 PM
He finally got his revenge against the man who asked him if he was up past his jail time.
Now it's up to us to ask why he's terrified to release #TheEPSTEIN_PedoFiles.
#StandWithTheSurvivors
Now it's up to us to ask why he's terrified to release #TheEPSTEIN_PedoFiles.
#StandWithTheSurvivors
Reposted
A grim reminder: these people will never be satisfied. There’s no point at which they will say “we’ve won, let’s enjoy life.” They will always be looking for someone else to punish, to revile, to dehumanize. They’re empty without that.
September 18, 2025 at 3:04 AM
A grim reminder: these people will never be satisfied. There’s no point at which they will say “we’ve won, let’s enjoy life.” They will always be looking for someone else to punish, to revile, to dehumanize. They’re empty without that.
Reposted
Just so I'm clear:
TV host says we should kill every homeless person? No big deal
TV host says the right must "go to war" with the left? Pfft.
TV host says the government is cracking down on critics? Well, the government cracks down on him for the criticism.
Free speech, everyone.
TV host says we should kill every homeless person? No big deal
TV host says the right must "go to war" with the left? Pfft.
TV host says the government is cracking down on critics? Well, the government cracks down on him for the criticism.
Free speech, everyone.
September 17, 2025 at 11:52 PM
Just so I'm clear:
TV host says we should kill every homeless person? No big deal
TV host says the right must "go to war" with the left? Pfft.
TV host says the government is cracking down on critics? Well, the government cracks down on him for the criticism.
Free speech, everyone.
TV host says we should kill every homeless person? No big deal
TV host says the right must "go to war" with the left? Pfft.
TV host says the government is cracking down on critics? Well, the government cracks down on him for the criticism.
Free speech, everyone.
Reposted
The remarks weren’t “about Charlie Kirk,” they were about how this administration is using Kirk’s death as an excuse to shut down critics … and they responded by proving him completely correct.
New: FCC chair threatens ABC and Disney over Jimmy Kimmel’s remarks about Charlie Kirk
www.cnn.com/2025/09/17/m...
www.cnn.com/2025/09/17/m...
FCC chair threatens ABC and Disney over Jimmy Kimmel’s remarks about Charlie Kirk | CNN Business
“We can do this the easy way or the hard way,” Carr warned. “These companies can find ways to change conduct and take actions on Kimmel, or there’s going to be additional work for the FCC ahead.”
www.cnn.com
September 17, 2025 at 10:42 PM
The remarks weren’t “about Charlie Kirk,” they were about how this administration is using Kirk’s death as an excuse to shut down critics … and they responded by proving him completely correct.
Reposted
“Get it all on record now. Get the films. Get the witnesses. Because somewhere down the road of history some bastard will get up and say that this never happened.”
Dwight D. Eisenhower
Dwight D. Eisenhower
September 1, 2025 at 7:23 PM
“Get it all on record now. Get the films. Get the witnesses. Because somewhere down the road of history some bastard will get up and say that this never happened.”
Dwight D. Eisenhower
Dwight D. Eisenhower
Reposted
The President cannot commandeer any local law enforcement.
The President does not run the Smithsonian.
The monthly BLS jobs report is required by law.
Release the Epstein files.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
The President does not run the Smithsonian.
The monthly BLS jobs report is required by law.
Release the Epstein files.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
August 13, 2025 at 2:09 PM
The President cannot commandeer any local law enforcement.
The President does not run the Smithsonian.
The monthly BLS jobs report is required by law.
Release the Epstein files.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
The President does not run the Smithsonian.
The monthly BLS jobs report is required by law.
Release the Epstein files.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Reposted
BREAKING: EXCLUSIVE: A higher up at the Bureau of Prisons WAIVED Ghislaine Maxwell's sex offender status in order to transfer her to a minimum security camp in Texas, per source. My latest: www.muellershewrote.com/p/exclusive-...
EXCLUSIVE: Someone Waived Ghislaine Maxwell's Sex Offender Status to Move Her to a Minimum Security Camp in Texas
According to sources, you can't move someone with a Public Safety Factor (PSF) designation - which Maxwell had - without waiving it. That's what happened here.
www.muellershewrote.com
August 1, 2025 at 5:20 PM
BREAKING: EXCLUSIVE: A higher up at the Bureau of Prisons WAIVED Ghislaine Maxwell's sex offender status in order to transfer her to a minimum security camp in Texas, per source. My latest: www.muellershewrote.com/p/exclusive-...
Reposted
Congrats to Lisa Murkowski on voting for a bill that she herself admitted was not ready in hopes that the House would change it. Now it’ll become law. She had the power to stop it, and instead chose to become complicit. That’s her legacy.
July 3, 2025 at 9:33 PM
Congrats to Lisa Murkowski on voting for a bill that she herself admitted was not ready in hopes that the House would change it. Now it’ll become law. She had the power to stop it, and instead chose to become complicit. That’s her legacy.
Reposted
Mike Johnson is voting to cut Medicaid.
Nearly 40% of his district relies on Medicaid.
Nearly 40% of his district relies on Medicaid.
July 2, 2025 at 6:08 PM
Mike Johnson is voting to cut Medicaid.
Nearly 40% of his district relies on Medicaid.
Nearly 40% of his district relies on Medicaid.
Reposted
The entire Latino population in the U.S. is 65 million. She means all of us.
July 2, 2025 at 5:49 PM
The entire Latino population in the U.S. is 65 million. She means all of us.
Reposted
This is Nick Begich (R-Alaska). If he votes for the bill,
37,000 of his constituents lose access to their healthcare.
27,000 of his constituents lose access to their food assistance.
578 energy jobs in his district will disappear.
37,000 of his constituents lose access to their healthcare.
27,000 of his constituents lose access to their food assistance.
578 energy jobs in his district will disappear.
July 2, 2025 at 7:38 PM
This is Nick Begich (R-Alaska). If he votes for the bill,
37,000 of his constituents lose access to their healthcare.
27,000 of his constituents lose access to their food assistance.
578 energy jobs in his district will disappear.
37,000 of his constituents lose access to their healthcare.
27,000 of his constituents lose access to their food assistance.
578 energy jobs in his district will disappear.
Reposted
This is David Schweikert (R-AZ). If he votes for this bill,
31,400 of his constituents would lose access to their healthcare.
18,700 households could lose access to their food assistance.
31,400 of his constituents would lose access to their healthcare.
18,700 households could lose access to their food assistance.
July 2, 2025 at 7:38 PM
This is David Schweikert (R-AZ). If he votes for this bill,
31,400 of his constituents would lose access to their healthcare.
18,700 households could lose access to their food assistance.
31,400 of his constituents would lose access to their healthcare.
18,700 households could lose access to their food assistance.
Reposted
AOC: "On this point of tax on tips, as one of the only people in this body who has lived off of tips, I want to tell you a little bit about the scam ... the cap on that is $25,000 while you're jacking up taxes on people who make less than $50,000 across the US ... while kicking them off the ACA."
July 2, 2025 at 3:37 PM
AOC: "On this point of tax on tips, as one of the only people in this body who has lived off of tips, I want to tell you a little bit about the scam ... the cap on that is $25,000 while you're jacking up taxes on people who make less than $50,000 across the US ... while kicking them off the ACA."
Reposted
This is Juan Ciscomani (R-AZ). If he votes for this bill,
31,925 of his constituents would lose access to their healthcare.
29,865 of his constituents could lose access to their food assistance.
4,520 energy jobs in his district could be lost.
31,925 of his constituents would lose access to their healthcare.
29,865 of his constituents could lose access to their food assistance.
4,520 energy jobs in his district could be lost.
July 2, 2025 at 7:38 PM
This is Juan Ciscomani (R-AZ). If he votes for this bill,
31,925 of his constituents would lose access to their healthcare.
29,865 of his constituents could lose access to their food assistance.
4,520 energy jobs in his district could be lost.
31,925 of his constituents would lose access to their healthcare.
29,865 of his constituents could lose access to their food assistance.
4,520 energy jobs in his district could be lost.
Reposted
This is David Valadao (R-CA). If he votes for this bill,
65,140 of his constituents would lose access to their healthcare.
60,580 of his constituents could lose access to their food assistance.
3,612 energy jobs in his district could be lost.
65,140 of his constituents would lose access to their healthcare.
60,580 of his constituents could lose access to their food assistance.
3,612 energy jobs in his district could be lost.
July 2, 2025 at 7:38 PM
This is David Valadao (R-CA). If he votes for this bill,
65,140 of his constituents would lose access to their healthcare.
60,580 of his constituents could lose access to their food assistance.
3,612 energy jobs in his district could be lost.
65,140 of his constituents would lose access to their healthcare.
60,580 of his constituents could lose access to their food assistance.
3,612 energy jobs in his district could be lost.
Reposted
This is Young Kim (R-CA). If she votes for this bill,
31,315 of her constituents would lose access to their healthcare.
14,993 of her constituents could lose access to their food assistance.
31,315 of her constituents would lose access to their healthcare.
14,993 of her constituents could lose access to their food assistance.
July 2, 2025 at 7:38 PM
This is Young Kim (R-CA). If she votes for this bill,
31,315 of her constituents would lose access to their healthcare.
14,993 of her constituents could lose access to their food assistance.
31,315 of her constituents would lose access to their healthcare.
14,993 of her constituents could lose access to their food assistance.
Reposted
This is Ken Calvert (R-CA). If he votes for this bill,
39,687 of his constituents would lose access to their healthcare.
30,709 of his constituents could lose access to their food assistance.
271 energy jobs in his district could be lost.
39,687 of his constituents would lose access to their healthcare.
30,709 of his constituents could lose access to their food assistance.
271 energy jobs in his district could be lost.
July 2, 2025 at 7:38 PM
This is Ken Calvert (R-CA). If he votes for this bill,
39,687 of his constituents would lose access to their healthcare.
30,709 of his constituents could lose access to their food assistance.
271 energy jobs in his district could be lost.
39,687 of his constituents would lose access to their healthcare.
30,709 of his constituents could lose access to their food assistance.
271 energy jobs in his district could be lost.
Reposted
This is Gave Evans (R-CO). If he votes for this bill,
29,276 of his constituents would lose access to their healthcare.
29,494 of his constituents could lose access to their food assistance.
886 energy jobs in his district could be lost.
29,276 of his constituents would lose access to their healthcare.
29,494 of his constituents could lose access to their food assistance.
886 energy jobs in his district could be lost.
July 2, 2025 at 7:38 PM
This is Gave Evans (R-CO). If he votes for this bill,
29,276 of his constituents would lose access to their healthcare.
29,494 of his constituents could lose access to their food assistance.
886 energy jobs in his district could be lost.
29,276 of his constituents would lose access to their healthcare.
29,494 of his constituents could lose access to their food assistance.
886 energy jobs in his district could be lost.
Reposted
This is Mariannette Miller-Meeks (R-IA). If she votes for this bill,
24,696 of her constituents would lose access to healthcare.
28,793 of her constituents could lose access to their food assistance.
1,320 energy jobs in her district could be lost.
At least 1 hospital in her district could be lost.
24,696 of her constituents would lose access to healthcare.
28,793 of her constituents could lose access to their food assistance.
1,320 energy jobs in her district could be lost.
At least 1 hospital in her district could be lost.
July 2, 2025 at 7:38 PM
This is Mariannette Miller-Meeks (R-IA). If she votes for this bill,
24,696 of her constituents would lose access to healthcare.
28,793 of her constituents could lose access to their food assistance.
1,320 energy jobs in her district could be lost.
At least 1 hospital in her district could be lost.
24,696 of her constituents would lose access to healthcare.
28,793 of her constituents could lose access to their food assistance.
1,320 energy jobs in her district could be lost.
At least 1 hospital in her district could be lost.
Reposted
This is Tom Barrett (R-MI). If he votes for this bill,
24,745 of his constituents would lose access to their healthcare.
30,044 of his constituents could lose access to their food assistance.
4,352 energy jobs in his district could be lost.
24,745 of his constituents would lose access to their healthcare.
30,044 of his constituents could lose access to their food assistance.
4,352 energy jobs in his district could be lost.
July 2, 2025 at 7:38 PM
This is Tom Barrett (R-MI). If he votes for this bill,
24,745 of his constituents would lose access to their healthcare.
30,044 of his constituents could lose access to their food assistance.
4,352 energy jobs in his district could be lost.
24,745 of his constituents would lose access to their healthcare.
30,044 of his constituents could lose access to their food assistance.
4,352 energy jobs in his district could be lost.
Reposted
Busting up big corporations and tackling Wall Street’s greed.
Getting big money out of politics.
Strengthening unions and fighting for higher wages.
Medicare for all, paid family leave, universal childcare...
This is the progressive populist agenda we need in America.
Getting big money out of politics.
Strengthening unions and fighting for higher wages.
Medicare for all, paid family leave, universal childcare...
This is the progressive populist agenda we need in America.
May 24, 2025 at 8:01 PM
Busting up big corporations and tackling Wall Street’s greed.
Getting big money out of politics.
Strengthening unions and fighting for higher wages.
Medicare for all, paid family leave, universal childcare...
This is the progressive populist agenda we need in America.
Getting big money out of politics.
Strengthening unions and fighting for higher wages.
Medicare for all, paid family leave, universal childcare...
This is the progressive populist agenda we need in America.
Reposted
Shoutout to Adam Schiff for saying what Republicans won’t—Trump’s tax cuts for billionaires are moving forward, and working people are about to lose their healthcare.
Next: make every House Republican vote on it. Let them show us who they really work for.
Next: make every House Republican vote on it. Let them show us who they really work for.
April 5, 2025 at 2:13 PM
Shoutout to Adam Schiff for saying what Republicans won’t—Trump’s tax cuts for billionaires are moving forward, and working people are about to lose their healthcare.
Next: make every House Republican vote on it. Let them show us who they really work for.
Next: make every House Republican vote on it. Let them show us who they really work for.