"He's unfit" isn't in dispute. But there will be no 25th and no impeachment; the GOP isn't going to step up.
Trump: You don’t know what’s going on. I know what’s going on. We know everything.
"He's unfit" isn't in dispute. But there will be no 25th and no impeachment; the GOP isn't going to step up.
But Trump's WHOLE DEAL was to lean into the QAnon garbage. We're just finding out about it NOW. His administration has known this stuff for a long time.
No arrests. Maxwell getting a deal.
But Trump's WHOLE DEAL was to lean into the QAnon garbage. We're just finding out about it NOW. His administration has known this stuff for a long time.
No arrests. Maxwell getting a deal.
Experts in the field step up to the microphone.
MAGA: "Booooo! NERRRRDS! We don't care what you say!"
Rotten pile of pumpkin husks shambles to microphone, demonstrates anti-knowledge.
MAGA: "See? He tells it like it is!"
Experts in the field step up to the microphone.
MAGA: "Booooo! NERRRRDS! We don't care what you say!"
Rotten pile of pumpkin husks shambles to microphone, demonstrates anti-knowledge.
MAGA: "See? He tells it like it is!"
Now MAGA would watch the shooting happen from ten different angles and then deny that guns exist.
Now MAGA would watch the shooting happen from ten different angles and then deny that guns exist.
But you *can* destroy his goons. He'll cut them loose (Flynn), they'll turn on each other (Noem and Miller), they'll say stuff on record that they can't take back (Rubio).
But you *can* destroy his goons. He'll cut them loose (Flynn), they'll turn on each other (Noem and Miller), they'll say stuff on record that they can't take back (Rubio).
Bondi puts a fucking quid pro quo in black and white, demanding voter records in exchange for pulling out ICE. MAGA squints, "Well, there's a lot of ways you could interpret that."
Bondi puts a fucking quid pro quo in black and white, demanding voter records in exchange for pulling out ICE. MAGA squints, "Well, there's a lot of ways you could interpret that."
1) The taunting rule is stupid
2) That was the most blatant textbook example of the rule and the ref even tried to let him off with a warning
3) If you know that the rule exists and do that, your head is full of nothing but stale marshmallows
1) The taunting rule is stupid
2) That was the most blatant textbook example of the rule and the ref even tried to let him off with a warning
3) If you know that the rule exists and do that, your head is full of nothing but stale marshmallows
We say Trump is doing shady shit, and the evidence is stuff like emails, documents, his own public statements, etc.
They say the protestors are fake, have literally never produced one paid protestor. Case closed. Vibes for the win.
We say Trump is doing shady shit, and the evidence is stuff like emails, documents, his own public statements, etc.
They say the protestors are fake, have literally never produced one paid protestor. Case closed. Vibes for the win.
MAGA won't end just because Trump leaves or dies; it will only end when it becomes impossible to ignore its impacts on everyday life.
MAGA won't end just because Trump leaves or dies; it will only end when it becomes impossible to ignore its impacts on everyday life.
When it's time to comply with the law and release the Epstein files: "What if I told you there was this dog with a hunger for pedo-files...?"
When it's time to comply with the law and release the Epstein files: "What if I told you there was this dog with a hunger for pedo-files...?"
Juror #7 has tickets to a baseball game and can't speak unless he includes a sports metaphor. At one point, he says that the defendant is "5-for-0."
He means "0-for-5."
Bugs me every time. It's my "Viggo broke his toe" moment when I watch with others.
Juror #7 has tickets to a baseball game and can't speak unless he includes a sports metaphor. At one point, he says that the defendant is "5-for-0."
He means "0-for-5."
Bugs me every time. It's my "Viggo broke his toe" moment when I watch with others.
People are upset because:
1) This is an act of war w/o Congress
2) Congress was actively lied to
3) The stated cause is hypocritical and/or false
4) Explicitly claiming oil?!
5) It violates intl law
6) Sets a bad precedent
People are upset because:
1) This is an act of war w/o Congress
2) Congress was actively lied to
3) The stated cause is hypocritical and/or false
4) Explicitly claiming oil?!
5) It violates intl law
6) Sets a bad precedent