Exactly. Driving legally is trivially easy and he has been officially warned about it on multiple occasions. He chose to drive dangerously, he can choose to drive safely. And if he is incapable of it, he should not be allowed to drive.

The headlines are not up to him but he constantly misuses ebike in the article. The only mention of motorcycle is in a single quote "This is basically a motorcycle.” And even in that basically is not needed and misleading.

They like to frolic by the sea too.

Blaming everything apart from their own lack of competence

"Things are much the same as they were" does not get ratings.

I don't see how it couldn't. This will be music to the ears of Horses (excluding 1998-2001)'s rivals

Yep, brick chimney stacks were used to hold in high pressure gases.

Spar own brand chocolate is really good.

I fear Big Llama may have blocked that ...

If a pedestrian is injured by a driver, they have been driven into. Even if they jumped into the path of the driver.

@peterwalker99.bsky.social www.waterstones.com/book/bike-na...
www.waterstones.com/book/the-mir...

The main problem is people thinking the lessons they learned were silly and "just for the test".
No one has ever "accelerated out of trouble" during a driving test and passed.

Maybe "hit" has baggage from "punched"?

"Driver of lorry collided with police officer", certainly seems more neutral. Even though it is unlikely that anyone would walk into the side of a fast moving vehicle. However this is more problematic when drivers pull into the path of people (still unlikely to be a pedestrian though)