We are calling for a stop to "Mutual Recognition" of these dangerous standards. Trade deals shouldn't come at the cost of lives on our streets.

Read more about the risks here:
etsc.eu/accepting-us...

these people are fraudsters selling snake oil and after their reforms crash and burn they'll be on to the next institution to do the same song and dance

This case in LA raises questions about video these bots collect, how it’s stored, retained, and available to police or potentially sold to other third parties.

To add onto this: a lot of people in legal media and the legal profession want to believe in the impartiality of the SCOTUS. The talking point that “John Roberts cares about his legacy and the appearance of the SCOTUS” has been parroted so often, do we even know that it’s ever been true?

I'm absolutely not an MMT Partisan, I'm sure it's as flawed as any of the other post Keynesian subschools, but the way in which people with their trousers round their ankles and their bare arses flapping in the wind discuss it is really quite something.

If MMT is as bad as you say it is then you need to come up with your own explanation for why everything sucks and nothing works, and how it can be fixed, because abundance, vibecession and "just let us raise taxes a bit" ain't it lads.

It’s not even just general group chats, it’s specifically “thought leaders” being in the same group chats as reactionary tech billionaires thinking they can influence them only for the influence to (predictably) flow the other way

I continue to think that Matty coming out against birthright citizenship a few months ago should have been taken as a major warning sign that the group chats have already decided to surrender on this.

Step 3: More rad folks - aka 7 #MA @aaup.org chapters - mobilize a collective response urging BU's Pres. to publicly defend the event (bc nuanced convo abt antisemitism = good) & denounce the bad faith campaign (bc smear = bad).

www.concernedjewishfaculty.org/aaup-denounce

4/5