Barton Stanley
@bartonstanley.org
fan of the natural world, reason, and compassion
This reading of Powell's words has previously been debunked.
bsky.app/profile/pear...
This is the limitation of so-called "new media" or "independent media". They are tiny operations that don't have the resources to ensure accuracy.
bsky.app/profile/pear...
This is the limitation of so-called "new media" or "independent media". They are tiny operations that don't have the resources to ensure accuracy.
Okay this is going to be long so mute it if you don't want a granular explanation but first: SHAME on @ronfilipkowski.bsky.social for misrepresenting what Chair Powell said in order to pat himself on the back. Shame on you.
Let's talk about measuring the 171mm people of the US labor force.
Let's talk about measuring the 171mm people of the US labor force.
@peark.es seems real bad that the fed chair doesn't trust the job numbers
December 12, 2025 at 12:06 AM
This reading of Powell's words has previously been debunked.
bsky.app/profile/pear...
This is the limitation of so-called "new media" or "independent media". They are tiny operations that don't have the resources to ensure accuracy.
bsky.app/profile/pear...
This is the limitation of so-called "new media" or "independent media". They are tiny operations that don't have the resources to ensure accuracy.
But you do need at least 37 assault rifles.
December 10, 2025 at 1:55 AM
But you do need at least 37 assault rifles.
I differ with you on some policy issues, but I stand with you 100% on this.
December 7, 2025 at 7:49 PM
I differ with you on some policy issues, but I stand with you 100% on this.
Sorry to hear it has come to this. Standing with you all the way.
November 23, 2025 at 11:11 PM
Sorry to hear it has come to this. Standing with you all the way.
Van Halen, not Van Hagar!
November 23, 2025 at 2:10 PM
Van Halen, not Van Hagar!
Bring back the gay guy.
November 21, 2025 at 1:18 AM
Bring back the gay guy.
I stand with you and the others 100% on this.
I categorically condemn the President's response to your joint statement.
I categorically condemn the President's response to your joint statement.
November 20, 2025 at 8:44 PM
I stand with you and the others 100% on this.
I categorically condemn the President's response to your joint statement.
I categorically condemn the President's response to your joint statement.
I stand with you and the others 100% on this.
I categorically condemn the President's response to your joint statement.
I categorically condemn the President's response to your joint statement.
November 20, 2025 at 8:23 PM
I stand with you and the others 100% on this.
I categorically condemn the President's response to your joint statement.
I categorically condemn the President's response to your joint statement.
I stand with you and the others 100% on this.
I categorically condemn the President's response to your joint statement.
I categorically condemn the President's response to your joint statement.
November 20, 2025 at 8:22 PM
I stand with you and the others 100% on this.
I categorically condemn the President's response to your joint statement.
I categorically condemn the President's response to your joint statement.
I stand with you and the others 100% on this.
I categorically condemn the President's response to your joint statement.
I categorically condemn the President's response to your joint statement.
November 20, 2025 at 8:21 PM
I stand with you and the others 100% on this.
I categorically condemn the President's response to your joint statement.
I categorically condemn the President's response to your joint statement.
I disagree with your votes to confirm some of the President's nominees. However, those votes are trivial compared to death threats for defending the Constitution.
I stand with you and the others 100%.
I categorically condemn the President's response to your joint statement.
I stand with you and the others 100%.
I categorically condemn the President's response to your joint statement.
November 20, 2025 at 8:14 PM
I disagree with your votes to confirm some of the President's nominees. However, those votes are trivial compared to death threats for defending the Constitution.
I stand with you and the others 100%.
I categorically condemn the President's response to your joint statement.
I stand with you and the others 100%.
I categorically condemn the President's response to your joint statement.
[cont'd]
What do you hope to find
Down in the pig mine?
You're nearly a laugh
You're nearly a laugh
But you're really a cry
-- Pink Floyd inspired in part by Orwell
What do you hope to find
Down in the pig mine?
You're nearly a laugh
You're nearly a laugh
But you're really a cry
-- Pink Floyd inspired in part by Orwell
November 20, 2025 at 1:14 AM
[cont'd]
What do you hope to find
Down in the pig mine?
You're nearly a laugh
You're nearly a laugh
But you're really a cry
-- Pink Floyd inspired in part by Orwell
What do you hope to find
Down in the pig mine?
You're nearly a laugh
You're nearly a laugh
But you're really a cry
-- Pink Floyd inspired in part by Orwell
"if" being the operative word here. I mean, toxic politics is her brand.
She voted to end the shutdown without a healthcare deal in hand. Not sure how that helped those in her district for whom she claims concern.
We'll know if this is a road-to-Damascus moment based on future votes, not words.
She voted to end the shutdown without a healthcare deal in hand. Not sure how that helped those in her district for whom she claims concern.
We'll know if this is a road-to-Damascus moment based on future votes, not words.
November 16, 2025 at 5:13 PM
"if" being the operative word here. I mean, toxic politics is her brand.
She voted to end the shutdown without a healthcare deal in hand. Not sure how that helped those in her district for whom she claims concern.
We'll know if this is a road-to-Damascus moment based on future votes, not words.
She voted to end the shutdown without a healthcare deal in hand. Not sure how that helped those in her district for whom she claims concern.
We'll know if this is a road-to-Damascus moment based on future votes, not words.
I'd rather be on a platform where everyone aspires to be constructive out of basic decency.
The reason I'm fighting DJT et al is because I mourn their destruction of the same.
If I make light of someone's death, I'm no better than those lot are and I betray what I'm fighting for.
The reason I'm fighting DJT et al is because I mourn their destruction of the same.
If I make light of someone's death, I'm no better than those lot are and I betray what I'm fighting for.
November 6, 2025 at 7:29 PM
I'd rather be on a platform where everyone aspires to be constructive out of basic decency.
The reason I'm fighting DJT et al is because I mourn their destruction of the same.
If I make light of someone's death, I'm no better than those lot are and I betray what I'm fighting for.
The reason I'm fighting DJT et al is because I mourn their destruction of the same.
If I make light of someone's death, I'm no better than those lot are and I betray what I'm fighting for.
In other words, he could still win.
He should not concede. Moreover, if it is allowed in Georgia, his campaign should participate in the process to get as many mail-in ballots as possible cured. Those ballots probably favor Democrats.
He should not concede. Moreover, if it is allowed in Georgia, his campaign should participate in the process to get as many mail-in ballots as possible cured. Those ballots probably favor Democrats.
November 5, 2025 at 2:59 PM
In other words, he could still win.
He should not concede. Moreover, if it is allowed in Georgia, his campaign should participate in the process to get as many mail-in ballots as possible cured. Those ballots probably favor Democrats.
He should not concede. Moreover, if it is allowed in Georgia, his campaign should participate in the process to get as many mail-in ballots as possible cured. Those ballots probably favor Democrats.
