In a just a world I should be able to sue Vance for stating publicly that I was part of a conspiracy by open society to smear Charlie Kirk because it resulted in harm to me including death and rape threats and so on but that is not how our law works.

Of course they have. But when they can do it publicly it adds a new level of danger for the critic and they know that. People who have already been radicalized can be motivated to go after those people using mass comms that didn’t exist during the Nixon or McCarthy eras

JD Vance said publicly that I was a soulless hack paid by George Soros’s org to bash Charlie Kirk and I got death threads and stalking nonsense as a result. And it’s not that government officials in the executive branch haven’t targeted individual journalists before …

Sex and gender aren't discrete and independent. The idea that we change our gender, but can't change our sex, is a transphobic canard with material social consequences for our rights. You get shit like "HRT validates trans people at a molecular level" instead of "Wow, HRT changes your sex". yea dawg

I'm starting to wonder where Westerners' skepticism goes anytime they hear something halfway 'exotic' about the third world, because the information y'all get about other cultures is so fucking warped and useless.

I don't get it