Archmaester Rigney
@archmaesterrigney.bsky.social
Game of Thrones fan fiction account.
Reposted by Archmaester Rigney
The correspondence between a NYT reporter & Epstein is extraordinary. But the NYT also has questions to answer: it fired him for soliciting a donation from Epstein. Did it not conduct any sort of investigation? Or did it just decide to not make public?
November 13, 2025 at 10:02 AM
The correspondence between a NYT reporter & Epstein is extraordinary. But the NYT also has questions to answer: it fired him for soliciting a donation from Epstein. Did it not conduct any sort of investigation? Or did it just decide to not make public?
Reposted by Archmaester Rigney
This by @eliothiggins.bsky.social, posted in June, captured the issue rather well…
November 11, 2025 at 1:09 PM
This by @eliothiggins.bsky.social, posted in June, captured the issue rather well…
This by @eliothiggins.bsky.social, posted in June, captured the issue rather well…
November 11, 2025 at 1:09 PM
This by @eliothiggins.bsky.social, posted in June, captured the issue rather well…
Reposted by Archmaester Rigney
Robbie Gibb again. Why has Nandy not sacked him? He has undermined trust in BBC News whilst giving the far right, Farage & Reform a huge platform with only a minimal amount of balance being allowed, balance that is now being shat on. Labour have a choice & pandering to Trump isn't the right decision
November 10, 2025 at 8:22 AM
Robbie Gibb again. Why has Nandy not sacked him? He has undermined trust in BBC News whilst giving the far right, Farage & Reform a huge platform with only a minimal amount of balance being allowed, balance that is now being shat on. Labour have a choice & pandering to Trump isn't the right decision
Reposted by Archmaester Rigney
Great investigation. Comprehensive indeed. But I’d argue it isn’t revelatory or shocking. Merely confirming with hard data what’s been obvious for a few years. Musk put into action his reason for buying it: convert Twitter into to a radicalisation machine on behalf of far-right, dictators, Nazis.
November 6, 2025 at 1:55 PM
Great investigation. Comprehensive indeed. But I’d argue it isn’t revelatory or shocking. Merely confirming with hard data what’s been obvious for a few years. Musk put into action his reason for buying it: convert Twitter into to a radicalisation machine on behalf of far-right, dictators, Nazis.
Great investigation. Comprehensive indeed. But I’d argue it isn’t revelatory or shocking. Merely confirming with hard data what’s been obvious for a few years. Musk put into action his reason for buying it: convert Twitter into to a radicalisation machine on behalf of far-right, dictators, Nazis.
November 6, 2025 at 1:55 PM
Great investigation. Comprehensive indeed. But I’d argue it isn’t revelatory or shocking. Merely confirming with hard data what’s been obvious for a few years. Musk put into action his reason for buying it: convert Twitter into to a radicalisation machine on behalf of far-right, dictators, Nazis.
Reposted by Archmaester Rigney
Great investigation, with hard data, confirming what was quite clear for years:
November 6, 2025 at 1:40 PM
Great investigation, with hard data, confirming what was quite clear for years: