amybuchananan.bsky.social
@amybuchananan.bsky.social
Transgender woman, living in Florida.
Watches too much SCOTUS / state legislative sessions.
Plays Satisfactory and Hardspace:Shipbreaker
It's 2025 and "America First" is putting all its chips on "corrective rape".
BREAKING: Trump administration plans to end prison rape protections for trans & intersex people, memo says. A DOJ memo says certain standards under the Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA) do not align with Trump’s Jan. 20 anti-trans executive order, @byadamrhodes.bsky.social reports.
Trump administration plans to end prison rape protections for trans and intersex people
A Department of Justice memo says certain standards under the Prison Rape Elimination Act do not align with Trump’s executive order
prismreports.org
December 5, 2025 at 1:39 AM
We could turn the tables and call the drug runners (alleged) narco-capitalists.
If the president can magically claim that drug runners are “narco-terrorists” to justify killing them, what’s to stop him from declaring democratic lawmakers as “political terrorists” or legally protesting American citizens as “agitator terrorists” to justify their murders?
December 4, 2025 at 12:40 AM
Half the votes are in, and it's very very very close!
December 3, 2025 at 1:57 AM
This war on christmas really needs to stop.
Let christmas movies, such as these, be christmas movies.
Already today I've seen posts declaring both Die Hard and A Muppet Christmas Carol as 'not Christmas movies'.

Y'all need some help.
December 2, 2025 at 2:53 PM
I really like this insight.

However, Baum himself did the thing by writing 13 more books.
Oz is her escapist fantasy! transforming it into a real place with politics and conflict cheapens the power of the original, in my opinion

that said, some of the songs are pretty dang good
December 2, 2025 at 12:06 AM
Department of War Crime
December 1, 2025 at 2:05 PM
Torturing myself with AI this morning.
November 29, 2025 at 5:34 PM
On 2026-10-14 in Florida, "Today we gather to celebrate the murder of a real asshole. Assholes shouldn't be murdered. Don't go murdering assholes please. Also, congratz to Mrs Vance #2"
November 29, 2025 at 4:41 PM
De jure discrimination? We can't get this murder defense in Florida stopped.

A bubba could see me at a public restaurant, whip out a gun and blow me away, and at the trial go on like Austin Powers and walk free.
November 29, 2025 at 4:37 PM
Seems like a congress that was on its game would impeach and remove based on threats of an illegal land invasion.

But no, we have lame congress that has to wait for people to die.
November 29, 2025 at 4:29 PM
DOJ argues that the executive branch correctly interpreted the court's order while the court itself incorrectly interpreted the court's order.

Bizarre argument. Wonder what the court will say about that.
DOJ offers up Noem as the proper target of Judge Boasberg's contempt proceedings and acknowledges that Todd Blanche and Emil Bove devised the laughably false assertion that the court lacked jurisdiction to enter orders respecting planes outside the U.S.
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
November 26, 2025 at 10:26 PM
Reposted
At Law Dork, I look into the challenges to DOJ’s subpoenas seeking invasive information from providers of gender-affirming medical care for trans minors. I write about 4 rulings for the challengers, 3 public opinions, and 2 instances of judges directly questioning the actions of DOJ’s lawyers.
Multiple judges call out DOJ's methods of defending its invasive trans care subpoenas
A trio of public rulings, including one on Friday, all side with providers. Two rulings also raised sharp questions about DOJ's moves in recent months.
www.lawdork.com
November 24, 2025 at 3:25 PM
In today's adventure of listening to 10 minutes of right-wing radio:

CT+BS were livid about the upcoming election that they purport will be stolen by, (checks notes), people voting fair and square.
November 25, 2025 at 2:37 AM
"Orders are presumed to be lawful" by whom?
REALITY: The last paragraph essentially acknowledges that everything above it is all bullshit spouted from their make-believe "War" department account. (Despite still including more bullshit about a "presumption" of lawfulness.)

Background: www.lawdork.com/p/donald-tru...
November 24, 2025 at 11:03 PM
Marvel Rivals continues to get more difficult to play.

I don't think I can make it to gold3, so not interested in competitive.
Quick play is losses leading to bot matches. I can make progress on proficiency, but it's rough.

It's like the game is telling me to just play vs bots in practice mode.
November 23, 2025 at 3:32 PM
Of course she has personal reasons to leave on Jan 5th.
But also consider:

Leaving a year earlier disrupts the calendar of Georgia republican efforts.
The House will go into the Jan budget fight with one fewer R seat.
November 22, 2025 at 3:23 PM
That's just sparkling tyranny.
If joking about Charlie Kirk is considered “violent rhetoric,” how do we describe open calls to hang members of Congress?
November 21, 2025 at 4:38 PM
I was told there were checks and balances.
The legislature is a dead org if it does not censure Trump over his violent speech, his misappropriation of funds, and his flaunting of appointments.
November 21, 2025 at 11:48 AM
Trump and his administration failed Charlie Kirk today.
November 21, 2025 at 2:34 AM
Halligan should be charged with impersonating a federal prosecutor.
This is almost unreal incompetence.

Here's how this area of inquiry was discussed in Monday's opinion.

In short, this is the afterthought, the ~it couldn't be this, could it?~ moment in the opinion: "If this procedure did not take place, then the Court is in uncharted legal territory ..."
November 20, 2025 at 3:34 AM
Judge Jerry Smith has allocated the majority of his brain to rent-free occupation by Judge Brown. Mr Smith mentions Judge Brown 278 times in this rant.

Mr Smith also mentions Mr Soros 17 times, but that a psychotic antisemite lives in Texas is not news.
Update: Here is Judge Jerry Smith’s dissent.

It is, as they say, a lot.

storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
November 20, 2025 at 1:26 AM
Suppose a bill passes House and Senate with 100% support. That bill can still be vetoed.

Generally, a President would avoid vetoing such a widely supported bill because the re-vote is very likely to go against him. But procedurally, he gets to veto it and require the re-vote.
I just read that “deemed as passed” isn’t veto proof. I’d love to know definitively…
November 19, 2025 at 2:16 AM
When ICE agents point guns in the face of someone that honked a car horn, I think of White Fragility.
November 19, 2025 at 2:13 AM
I mean yeah, releasing evidence of the President's criminal activities would be a national security risk. Worth it though.
BREAKING: Releasing the Epstein files without redactions could pose a national security risk, according to House Speaker Mike Johnson.
November 18, 2025 at 7:09 PM
Yesterday (Nov 17), preliminary injunctions were renewed in three cases against the Federal Admin's categorical anti-trans prison policy.

Housing is to be maintained. Medication is to be continued.

Jane Jones v Trump
Jane Doe v Bondi
Alishea Kingdom v Trump
November 18, 2025 at 5:37 PM